Again, if they are following a practice that is deemed illegal by the US government, then they have to comply with US government rules if they are doing business with the US government. As for proving that they are following the boycott, it's a documented fact in the article due to direct interview. When you say it has not been proven, are you saying that the quoted interview was false?
> If it is illegal for them to operate in the US while following foreign > law on foreign soil, then there's your conflict. I don't think that's > been proven one way or the other conclusively. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:198337 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
