My quick and personal view, from reading the second paragraph: "...Justice John Paul Stevens, who said the proposed trials were illegal under U.S. law and international Geneva conventions." was that all terrorist will now be treated like American citizens. This is not good since the terrorist have no laws to follow.
Then I heard this on Rush: "Today's Supreme Court decision reaffirms the American ideal that all are entitled to the basic guarantees of our justice system. This is a triumph for the rule of law. The rights of due process are among our most cherished liberties, and today's decision is a rebuke of the Bush Administration's detainee policies and a reminder of our responsibility to protect both the American people and our Constitutional rights. We cannot allow the values on which our country was founded to become a casualty in the war on terrorism." - Nancy Pelosi This tells me our laws protect terrorist anywhere in the world that are trying to kill us. And she's ok with that. A photo goes with it:) http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/today.ParTop.0002.ImageFile.gif Then I read the Mark Levin piece: http://levin.nationalreview.com/ I have a lot of trust in Mr. Levin's opinions when it comes to the judicial branch, since it's one of my many weak points. But I like to stay open minded and would love to here opposing views. On 6/29/06, Howie Hamlin wrote: > Just for my own curiosity - what is your personal opinion on this ruling? > > Regards, > > Howie > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:210519 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
