On 6/30/06, Gruss Gott wrote: > The war in Afghanistan is over. It started when we invaded and ended > once Afghanistan had a independently functioning government with a > security force. Any issues there now are simply security, not war.
So we're security guards? > Plus Congress never declared War. But they did: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_Resolution_to_Authorize_the_Use_of_United_States_Armed_Forces_Against_Iraq What is your definition of a congressional declaration of war? > Iraq. See above. Once an independent form of government is in place, the > war is over and it becomes a security question. > The War On Terror. There is no such thing. So the threat is imaginary? We are not at war with al Qaeda and all other terrorist groups? So we should surrender and wait for another attack, after which we will track down the perpetrators and bring them to justice through our oh so efficient (OJ, BlakeĀ ) court system? Obviously you lost no one on 9/11. > The way you can tell is > that US government has renamed it 5 times. Do tell all the names please since I am only familiar with the one. > There are security issues unless and until we find a foreign government > that's supporting hostile action against US citizens because they are US > citizens. When that occurs we can decide to declare war or to continue with > security actions. So unless they have a government sponsorship they are free to terrorize at will? Excluding the fact that they might have to go through our ever so strict judicial system. Are you playing with me or do you really believe this shit? Hmmm, OK you got me, my bad, hehehe that was funny ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:210545 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
