On 7/2/06, Gruss Gott wrote: > This is a sad example of the "culture of outrage" purveyors such as > Rush, Ann Coulter, etc. Their goal is create an "us" and "them" > culture from which they can profit. To do that they have to define > "them" and then outrage their audience into thinking that they're > "us".
The "them" is very real and it represents you. The same way that you always claim Bush supporters are Religious fundamentalists, or brainwashed knobs. You represent the extreme fringe of the left > The "them" are, of course, fictitious inventions of the outrage > hawkers. Those under the sway of the demagogues lose their ability to > debate over what is said, and instead debate with the talking points > given them. Like you not addressing the point but attacking the messenger? > Because they have been convinced they're "us", they assume anyone that > doesn't agree with everything they say must be "them". Typically "us" > people lack the mental horsepower to design and devise their own view, > which is what attracted them to the demagogues in the first place. Mental horsepower? You want the GC to apply to al Qaeda and think I'm simple. In your simpleton world everyone involved in killing Zarqawi should be charged with murder, because he's innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. > And so the result is, you get ridiculous, pathetic, moronic statements > like "you really hate this country ... blah, blah, blah". It's hard > to even write that without laughing. I still have trouble believing > someone did. > > It has, however, created quite a large amount of entertainment for > many friends so I have trouble discouraging it. Nevertheless, if I > don't without pointing out how ridiculous it is, then I would taking > advantage of someone. My bad, I keep making the assumption that most people have little trouble grasping the obvious. So for the slow thinking ones in your circle-jerk I'll spell it out. To imply that anyone can walk up to an American soldier and point to a neighbor, claim they're a terrorist and get handed a check for $25k, show's how little respect you have for our nation and the people in our military > So, to preserve my ethics, here is my post stating how ridiculous this > statement is and how bluntly it shows an abdication of thought in > favor of parroting talking points from modern day idea grifters such > as Rush and Coulter the mananimal. They say don't argue with an idiot, he will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience. My bad again. They also say people that don't have the capacity to win an argument go on the attack. So instead of showing even one example where Rush or Culture are incorrect, you claim they have some kind of magical brainwashing power to control peoples thoughts. Then claim Rush is an addict so he doesn't matter, as if all addicts and or recovered addicts were worthless. Now you insult Anne Coulter by claiming she's a man. Remember Monica was referred to as a portly pepper pot, not a fat ugly pig? Remember how the other side was treated? Paula Jones, Linda Tripp, Wanita Broderick, Catherine Harris and now Anne Coulter? You fall right into that frame of thinking that was brainwashed into you from the left. You're one of "them". ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:210589 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
