Be careful what you are agreeing with. I think the kid should do chemo too.....but that aint my decision, and it sure as hell aint a courts decision.
Today they are deciding what this kid should do, tomorrow it might be you. On 7/13/06, Duane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Chemo can be pretty nasty, but isn't always. It depends on the individual. > I > had 4 months of Chemo (RCHOP) treatments for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma a > couple > of years ago and I can honestly say that it wasn't that bad. Up until the > last treatment the side effects were pretty mild. It was only during the > last cycle did I even take a day off work not counting the day I took off > for treatments (6 hours strapped to an IV). > > I would have to agree with the courts in this case, there is too much at > stake to try an organic only treatment. If the parents want to try it > fine, > but only "as well as" not "instead of" chemotherapy. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:5/messageid:211055 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
