> Duane wrote: > At some point the welfare of the child is more important then parental > choice. These people have made a choice that endangers the welfare of the > child.
What about letting kids eat ice cream and play PS2 all day? What about childhood sports where there is a high degree of injury, some of it fatal? How about childhood TV stars? They ALWAYS turn out bad. Doesn't that also endanger the child? Is your point that parents shouldn't really make parental decisions? That the government should define it and is really everyone's parent? And so if parents don't conform to the government's parental SOP then it's time for the government to raise kids? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:5/messageid:211073 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
