all good points. Suppose however that those two soldiers are already dead? I am not get into history, which I know you know better than I do. I am just asking for input. I can definitely see the security problem with Hizbollah. But what if (and I don't know that this is the case) it's an Afghanistan-like situaton where the government can't do that? What would you suggest then?
On 7/28/06, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Israel has given what it needs for a ceasefire. No one else calling for a > ceasefile has even mentioned those needs. The kidnapped soldiers have to be > returned. The root of all this was a kidnapping over the international > border by a part of the Lebanese government and that has to be rectified. > The second thing is that Hizballah has to be removed from the border as a > threat. If this is not done, then the ceasefire will just be a re-arming > time for them until the next time they attack (in a week by their record). > Finally, Lebanon has to put their soldiers on the border as they agreed to. > > Do you see any of these things happening? If not, then any ceasefire is a > joke and an attempt to stop Israel from defending itself and returning it's > kidnapped citizens. > > But what do you expect from the UN, which blaims Israel for attacking a UN > position where Hizballah fighters are shooting from yet ignores when > Hizballah both used these positions as human shields and actually shoots at > them. > It's another "hey Jews, roll over and play dead. Oh, don't play" > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:211996 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
