You mean the one to stop a weapons shipment to Hezballah that is banned by the ceasefire? If one side is violating an agreement to the physical detriment of the other (and getting more civilian killing rockets is just that), then one side has the right to uphold that agreement. The agreement says that Hezballah will be disarmed. Israel is waiting for that. The agreement bans further arming of Hezballah. Israel has upheld that. Is it a violation of the agreement? No. Is it a violation of Kofi's idea of the agreement? Yes. Where's the trust when those enforcing the agreement (French, EU troops, etc) are in fear of their lives because one side of the agreement (Hezballah) might kill them?
> Even today, they've shown that all the negotiations of the >>past are meaningless. > > What about the Israeli commando weekend's raid deep inside Lebanon over > the weekend? > > How does that measure up against negotiations and trust? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:213776 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
