yeah, the example only works for young children.

On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Scott Stroz<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Judah McAuley<[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I understand your point. But the question is how the law is written.
>> Which is a better approach: do we try and analyze the content of the
>> each test and try to somehow neutrally determine whether it is biased
>> or do we look at the outcome of the test and judge based off of its
>> implementation?
>>
>> I don't know the specifics of the New Haven test. But I can see a
>> situation where I would look at a test and not think anything of it
>> because I'm a white dude who is really good at standardized testing,
>> whereas it might be rather incomprehensible to someone not of that
>> background in spite of the fact that we aren't trying to test how good
>> we are at standardized tests.
>>
>> Why were minorities passing this test at a much lower rate given
>> roughly equivalent experience? I got no clue. But is it unreasonable
>> to say that the test if flawed if two groups which should perform
>> roughly the same are not, even if you don't know the fundamental cause
>> of the discrepancy? It wasn't like they said that the white dudes were
>> going to take a different, harder test. They just said that test must
>> not be a good one if people who ought to be passing are not when the
>> only obvious reason is racial background.
>>
>>
>
> Only obvious reason does not mean only reason. It is also entirely
> possible that all the non-whites who took the test were idiots or
> maybe did not prepare as much because they knew that they might be
> needed to fill a quota.
>
> I can understand the Navajo/pizza explanation in that specific case.
> But if a Navajo and a white guy have been working at a pizza place for
> 3 years and the Navajo still can't answer the question, than odds are
> its because he's an idiot and has nothing to do with being a Najavo.
> --
> Scott Stroz
> ---------------
> The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who
> are willing to work and give to those who would not. - Thomas
> Jefferson
>
> http://xkcd.com/386/
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know 
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:299260
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to