And I am not saying you were wrong to do so. Of course, ignoring that
allows you to exercise your indignation, so...

All I am saying is that there are places where doing that will get you
sabotaged with extreme prejudice. Not that I agree with this
happening.

All I am saying is that the question assumes that the officer will do
the proper thing.

But hey. I am not invested in this.

So sure. You are right. People who disagree with you are terrorists or
welfare cheats or probably both. Now, I have work to do and can't be
bothered with your crap any more.


On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Scott Stroz<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I am befuddled how the correct answer to question 19 would be
> determined by the 'white middle class' and in case you got the
> questions mixed up, I am befuddled how the answer to question 20 would
> be determined by the 'white middle class'.
>
> As for question 20,I don;t give a rat's ass about culture.  I worked
> in Emergency Services for almost 20 years and, sadly, on more than one
> occasion, reported a co-worker for showing up to work with alcohol on
> their breath (can't say if they were actually drunk - but I did not
> care). That has nothing to do with 'ratting out' someone and
> everything to do with making sure that we were actually able to
> protect the people we were paid to protect.  If a 'culture' says
> differently, than, sorry, they should not be in that job - and that
> question would be a good one to use to eliminate someone from
> consideration.
>
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Dana<[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> welp... one of the groups I am talking about is the Irish. That's a
>> pretty big group. Another is inner-city blacks and Hispanics and those
>> too are pretty big groups.
>>
>> I guess I am having trouble understanding why a question's correct
>> answer is determined by white middle-class culture, as the #19
>> question seems to be.
>>
>> Perhaps we want respect for authority in our lieutenant candidates, in
>> which case the question, while embodying cultural norms, has a
>> presumably legal rationale.
>>
>> It would not however seem to be a good measure of thinking outside the
>> box (for instance).
>>
>> But hey, IANAL... that's just my own possibly flawed understanding.
>> But I see people here getting upset when the answer they are sure is
>> correct is questioned.
>>
>> That actually does seem a bit biased.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Scott Stroz<[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Well, Cameron and I asked for examples of 'culturally biased'
>>> questions and you posted the two examples we have been discussing. You
>>> have to forgive a good old boy when he asks a question and assumes
>>> what he gets in return was actually an answer to that question.
>>>
>>> So, again (and I will reword using your terms), if a question goes
>>> against 'the cultural norm' why is it immediately the question and not
>>> the 'culture' that has the problem?
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Dana<[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> You know -- I try hard not to pigeonhole you as a good old boy.
>>>> Sometimes you make it hard.
>>>>
>>>> a) I did not say biased, you did. I said "contains a cultural norm."
>>>>
>>>> b) I also said that whether this is an issue depends on multiple factors.
>>>>
>>>> please explain what part of this is hard to understand.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Scott Stroz<[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> OK..it would make the question culturally biased, how?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Dana<[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> actually I didn't say racially I said culturally. And if people of
>>>>>> different cultures think different answers are correct then there is a
>>>>>> cultural norm in the question.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Whether this is unfair depends.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Scott Stroz<[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Dana<[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But there are also groups where "ratting" is always the wrong answer,
>>>>>>>> and without ignoring the situation you can also take him home. I can
>>>>>>>> think of several people I know who would do exactly that.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And that would make the question racially biased, how?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Scott Stroz
>>>>>>> ---------------
>>>>>>> The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who
>>>>>>> are willing to work and give to those who would not. - Thomas
>>>>>>> Jefferson
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://xkcd.com/386/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know 
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:299353
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to