" the new law will go into effect 90 days after the legislature adjourns. "

On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Brian Thornton <[email protected]>wrote:

> The law doesn't even go into effect for 90 days... why are you flat out
> lying?
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Eric Roberts <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> There was already a truck driver that was arrested and detained.  He is a
>> natural-born US citizen.  He stopped at a weigh station and was asked to
>> see
>> him immigration papers and when he said he was a US citizen, they arrested
>> and detained him until his wife could drive (a considerable distance) with
>> his birth certificate.  That is a violation of the this man's civil rights
>> and why this law is a POS law thinly disguising rascism.
>>
>> Eric
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Judah McAuley [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 4:13 PM
>> To: cf-community
>> Subject: Re: Closing the border
>>
>>
>> First off, the link to the bill presented here was not a link to the
>> bill, but rather to its legislative summary. And hopefully we all know
>> that a legislative summary does not necessarily have anything to do
>> with the actual contents of the bill.  Here is the final text of the
>> Senate version of the bill:
>>
>> http://www.azleg.gov/FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=/legtext/49leg/2r/bills/sb1070
>> s.htm<http://www.azleg.gov/FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=/legtext/49leg/2r/bills/sb1070%0As.htm>
>>
>> Next, getting to your question about where in the bill it allows the
>> demand of identification:
>>
>> Sec. 2.  Title 11, chapter 7, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended by
>> adding article 8, to read:
>> ...
>> B.  FOR ANY LAWFUL CONTACT MADE BY A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL OR
>> AGENCY OF THIS STATE OR A COUNTY, CITY, TOWN OR OTHER POLITICAL
>> SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE WHERE REASONABLE SUSPICION EXISTS THAT THE
>> PERSON IS AN ALIEN WHO IS UNLAWFULLY PRESENT IN THE UNITED STATES, A
>> REASONABLE ATTEMPT SHALL BE MADE, WHEN PRACTICABLE, TO DETERMINE THE
>> IMMIGRATION STATUS OF THE PERSON.  THE PERSON'S IMMIGRATION STATUS
>> SHALL BE VERIFIED WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT PURSUANT TO 8 UNITED
>> STATES CODE SECTION 1373(c).
>>
>> And then further amends Sec. 4.  Section 13-2319, Arizona Revised
>> Statutes, is amended to read:
>>
>> E.  NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER LAW, A PEACE OFFICER MAY LAWFULLY STOP
>> ANY PERSON WHO IS OPERATING A MOTOR VEHICLE IF THE OFFICER HAS
>> REASONABLE SUSPICION TO BELIEVE THE PERSON IS IN VIOLATION OF ANY
>> CIVIL TRAFFIC LAW AND THIS SECTION.
>>
>> So, any sort of lawful contact by any law enforcement official or any
>> agency of any part of any section of the government in the state of
>> Arizona can result in checking immigration status. That means a health
>> inspector at a restaurant, that means a cop checking on a suspicious
>> noise that someone heard, that means parking meter attendant who talks
>> to you as they are writing up a parking ticket for your car. And a cop
>> who pulls you over for anything at all, "you look like you were
>> swerving to me" or "the light on your license plate isn't bright
>> enough" can pull you over and check your immigration status.
>>
>> So yeah, the law does, indeed, say exactly what I said it said. And as
>> for the rest of your questions, yes, I would say that their approach
>> is quite hamfisted.
>>
>> Judah
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Jerry Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Judah,
>> >
>> > Where in the text of the bill does it allow the cops to pull over and
>> demand
>> > identification from anyone? Everyone keeps saying that, but I don't see
>> it.
>> >
>> > But, regardless of whether that ability for police exists (I don't think
>> the
>> > bill allows that - nor SHOULD the bill allow that, demanding papers
>> randomly
>> > is NOT American), let us set that aside for the moment. We will come
>> back
>> to
>> > it, I promise.
>> >
>> > How about the other provisions?
>> > 1. no hiring
>> > 2. no aiding illegal entry
>> > 3. no transporting
>> > 4. cities and churches no longer being able to create sanctuaries
>> > 5. not releasing illegals from jail without checking.
>> > 6. making being illegal a misdemeanor.
>> > 7. making false documents illegal
>> > 8. no causing traffic jams at day labor pickup spots.
>> >
>> > Are they also hamfisted for you?
>> >
>> > But, even before that, I would love to know how each person here would
>> > answer these questions:
>> >
>> > 1. is it illegal to be "undocumented"?
>> > 2. is it a crime?
>> > 3. should it be a crime?
>> > 4. is it wrong?
>> > 5. should illegal immigrants be given a plaque? ignored? fined?
>> deported?
>> > jailed and then deported?
>> > 6. should there be a border?
>> >
>> > my answers:
>> > 1. yes
>> > 2. yes
>> > 3. yes
>> > 4. no. and yes. do the crime, do the time. but it may still be right for
>> > some people, even with the penalties.
>> > 5. deport except in unique circumstances.
>> > 6. yes
>> >
>> > On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Judah McAuley <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Out of curiosity, which parts of the bill do you like? It seems like a
>> >> rather hamfisted attempt at dealing with immigration issues.
>> >>
>> >> I mean, come on, empowering the cops to pull over and demand
>> >> identification from anyone they might suspect is an illegal immigrant?
>> >> How, exactly, does one reasonably decide that a person might be an
>> >> illegal immigrant? Is it what they look like or wear? Some sort of
>> >> furtive movement like they use as a pretext for drug searches? What
>> >> makes you say, "that person is an illegal immigrant"?
>> >>
>> >> I'm genuinely curious.
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know 
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:316664
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to