I gotcha, but knew others wouldn't, ergo my response :)
On Jan 10, 2013 2:05 PM, "Bruce Sorge" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Ok, I was not being totally serious about this. We use machine guns for
> suppression and creating mass casualties, not spray and pray. That is what
> haj does, not us. I was just trying to be a little funny but obviously
> failed.
>
> Sent from my iPhone 4S.
>
> On Jan 10, 2013, at 1:43 PM, "Larry C. Lyons" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > My own opinion is that I've never liked the spray and pray approach I
> > experience when on exercise with the US military (this is when I was
> > with the Canadian Forces - at NATO Reforger and Able Archer). Our own
> > emphasis was on "musketry" and aimed suppression fire. A very
> > different approach.
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Bruce Sorge <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> That was more if a rhetorical statement and was not pointed at you Tim.
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPhone 4S.
> >>
> >> On Jan 10, 2013, at 1:01 PM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> I know this man, I speant a couple of years in weapons squads in the
> 82nd
> >>> and the 29th.  Yes the crew served weapons are our most casualty
> producing
> >>> weapons.  That doesn't really pertain to our current discussion
> however as
> >>> legal machine guns have been used in exactly 1 crime since the
> inception of
> >>> the NFA in the 30s.  Beofre that you could mail order them.
> >>> On Jan 10, 2013 12:42 PM, "Bruce Sorge" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> That's why we have machine guns. To spray the enemy and keep their
> heads
> >>>> down.
> >>>>
> >>>> Sent from my iPhone 4S.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Jan 10, 2013, at 12:17 PM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'm saying that yes, a capable man with a 10 shot bolt gun with
> optics
> >>>> can
> >>>>> do far more damage than someone with a 30 round semi-auto.  Trained
> >>>> people
> >>>>> don't spray and pray, we fire single aimed shots at point targets,
> and
> >>>> with
> >>>>> a bolt action 300 win mag you can tap people near a mile away,
> through
> >>>>> armor.  Something you certainly could never do with that AR.
> >>>>> On Jan 10, 2013 12:10 PM, "Larry C. Lyons" <[email protected]>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So you're telling me that someone with a single shot bolt action
> rifle
> >>>>>> can do as much damage as an AR-15.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Trained rifleman late 19th century using such a rifle (Martini-Henry
> >>>>>> Rifle for instance) could fire around 10-20 rounds per minute on a
> >>>>>> good day. A bushmaster in the hands of someone with minimal training
> >>>>>> is anywhere from 45 to 120 rounds per minute.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> BTW that chart I noted previously showed that even though Canadian
> >>>>>> firearms laws became increasingly more restrictive, the homicide
> rate
> >>>>>> by other means remained relatively stable or even declined.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:46 AM, LRS Scout <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> It's funny, Larry mentioned several failed states and genocides
> >>>> earlier.
> >>>>>>> However if you look to sme of the very incidents he mentions you
> see it
> >>>>>> is
> >>>>>>> a person with a motive that kills, not the gun.  How many hundreds
> of
> >>>>>>> thousands, even millions, were killed, tortured and disfigured with
> >>>>>>> machetes?  How many would still be alive today if they had an AK
> under
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>>> bed and a pistol on the night stand?
> >>>>>>> On Jan 10, 2013 11:42 AM, "Jerry Barnes" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> "Gun control works if it's area wide.....country wide......it
> hasn't
> >>>>>>>> worked in
> >>>>>>>> America because it's isolated."
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Maybe we should mimic Mexico's gun control program.  It's
> nationwide
> >>>> and
> >>>>>>>> very restrictive.  Works great.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> J
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> -
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to
> achieve
> >>>> the
> >>>>>>>> national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a
> >>>>>> civilian
> >>>>>>>> national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong,
> just
> >>>> as
> >>>>>>>> well-funded. - Barack Obama
> >
> >
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:359943
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to