I loved the Ma Duece.  Reliable, accurate and lethal as hell.
On Jan 10, 2013 2:22 PM, "Larry C. Lyons" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> that said what really impressed me was how accurate the M2 was. And
> those mf'ers stuck me with an SMG!
>
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Larry C. Lyons <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > It was something I saw during my tenure with the CF on some NATO and
> > other exercises with National Guard soldiers the164th Infantry from
> > ND). This was when the US army was at a particularly low point post
> > Vietnam and before the Vietnam generation of officers and NCO's became
> > the commanders, colonels and generals. I remember our RSM after one
> > live fire exercise just walk away shaking his head. This man was
> > profane in 5 languages and the S&P left him speechless.
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Bruce Sorge <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Ok, I was not being totally serious about this. We use machine guns for
> suppression and creating mass casualties, not spray and pray. That is what
> haj does, not us. I was just trying to be a little funny but obviously
> failed.
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPhone 4S.
> >>
> >> On Jan 10, 2013, at 1:43 PM, "Larry C. Lyons" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> My own opinion is that I've never liked the spray and pray approach I
> >>> experience when on exercise with the US military (this is when I was
> >>> with the Canadian Forces - at NATO Reforger and Able Archer). Our own
> >>> emphasis was on "musketry" and aimed suppression fire. A very
> >>> different approach.
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Bruce Sorge <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> That was more if a rhetorical statement and was not pointed at you
> Tim.
> >>>>
> >>>> Sent from my iPhone 4S.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Jan 10, 2013, at 1:01 PM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I know this man, I speant a couple of years in weapons squads in the
> 82nd
> >>>>> and the 29th.  Yes the crew served weapons are our most casualty
> producing
> >>>>> weapons.  That doesn't really pertain to our current discussion
> however as
> >>>>> legal machine guns have been used in exactly 1 crime since the
> inception of
> >>>>> the NFA in the 30s.  Beofre that you could mail order them.
> >>>>> On Jan 10, 2013 12:42 PM, "Bruce Sorge" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> That's why we have machine guns. To spray the enemy and keep their
> heads
> >>>>>> down.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone 4S.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Jan 10, 2013, at 12:17 PM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I'm saying that yes, a capable man with a 10 shot bolt gun with
> optics
> >>>>>> can
> >>>>>>> do far more damage than someone with a 30 round semi-auto.  Trained
> >>>>>> people
> >>>>>>> don't spray and pray, we fire single aimed shots at point targets,
> and
> >>>>>> with
> >>>>>>> a bolt action 300 win mag you can tap people near a mile away,
> through
> >>>>>>> armor.  Something you certainly could never do with that AR.
> >>>>>>> On Jan 10, 2013 12:10 PM, "Larry C. Lyons" <[email protected]>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> So you're telling me that someone with a single shot bolt action
> rifle
> >>>>>>>> can do as much damage as an AR-15.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Trained rifleman late 19th century using such a rifle
> (Martini-Henry
> >>>>>>>> Rifle for instance) could fire around 10-20 rounds per minute on a
> >>>>>>>> good day. A bushmaster in the hands of someone with minimal
> training
> >>>>>>>> is anywhere from 45 to 120 rounds per minute.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> BTW that chart I noted previously showed that even though Canadian
> >>>>>>>> firearms laws became increasingly more restrictive, the homicide
> rate
> >>>>>>>> by other means remained relatively stable or even declined.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:46 AM, LRS Scout <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> It's funny, Larry mentioned several failed states and genocides
> >>>>>> earlier.
> >>>>>>>>> However if you look to sme of the very incidents he mentions you
> see it
> >>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>> a person with a motive that kills, not the gun.  How many
> hundreds of
> >>>>>>>>> thousands, even millions, were killed, tortured and disfigured
> with
> >>>>>>>>> machetes?  How many would still be alive today if they had an AK
> under
> >>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>> bed and a pistol on the night stand?
> >>>>>>>>> On Jan 10, 2013 11:42 AM, "Jerry Barnes" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> "Gun control works if it's area wide.....country wide......it
> hasn't
> >>>>>>>>>> worked in
> >>>>>>>>>> America because it's isolated."
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Maybe we should mimic Mexico's gun control program.  It's
> nationwide
> >>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>> very restrictive.  Works great.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> J
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> -
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to
> achieve
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a
> >>>>>>>> civilian
> >>>>>>>>>> national security force that's just as powerful, just as
> strong, just
> >>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>> well-funded. - Barack Obama
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:359952
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm

Reply via email to