any new legislation, or any new executive orders, should be measured against past actual horrors, to see if in fact the legislation would have made any appreciable difference.
if the answer is no, then that should (in my mind) kill the legislation right there. we know how to war-game, and predict, and measure rule changes against outcomes. why we dont apply this knowledge to proposed changes is insane to me. if the answer is yes, then and only then should we look at what is LOST in exchange for that new protection or change. And we should talk about it (rationally and politely), and then come to a consensus as a county, and then move forward. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:359959 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
