Heller is totally in opposition to what the 2nd amendment actually says. -----Original Message----- From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 9:47 AM To: cf-community Subject: Re: Possible Executive Action - Gun Control
What they don't mention is that most of the time those hand forged AK's don't last very long. LIke Dredd Scott, I think that the Heller and similar decisions was done for pure ideology, not the law. Eventually Heller, like the Dredd Scott decision, it will be reversed and generally considered one of the worst decisions of the SCOTUS. On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:30 AM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> wrote: > > You're insane if you can't see that drug prohibition has failed, and > can't see that gun prohibition will got the same way. People own > machine shops, and Afghanis make AK-47s with hammers and tongs over open fires. > > In the end I don't care what anyone else thinks on this matter. You > do not have the right to legislate in this area, and the supreme court > has been clear on this issue time and again. Heller, McDonald and now > the Illinois CCW case. The 2nd is an individual right and allows for > military style weapons, long guns and handguns alike. We still > haven't seen all the fall out from these cases. They will have a deep > impact on everything from constitutional national concealed carry to > machine gun laws. New laws will not stand, even if it is war that will be required to do away with them. > > My oath of enlistment was to the constitution of the United States of > America, and it had no expiration date. There are literally millions > of us out here that will do whatever we need to do in order to defend > and protect the constitution against all enemies, foreign and > domestic, and I have come to see our government as the primary threat > against the liberties and freedoms born to us as American citizens and > even free men regardless of creed or nationality. > On Jan 10, 2013 9:28 AM, "GMoney" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> It actually has. If they'd quit wasting time and resources on pot, >> they can be even more affective against drugs that all of us agree >> are bad news, like meth. >> >> My only beef is with hand guns. I just think their size and lethality >> serve to make them perfect tools for crimes, and not very good for >> much else. I think we'd get along just fine without them. >> >> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Sam <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > >> > That worked so well for drugs too. >> > If you take guns away from law abiding citizens then only the >> > criminals will have them. >> > >> > . >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 9:10 AM, GMoney <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> > > Gun control works if it's area wide.....country wide......it >> > > hasn't >> > worked >> > > in America because it's isolated. I mean, it's like diving to the >> middle >> > of >> > > the Pacific, and declaring it a "water-free zone"...then >> > > wondering why everything there is still wet. >> > > >> > >> > >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:359978 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
