Actually if we followed the constitution we'd have regulatory control over drug producers, rather than the unregulated BS we face today.
Firearms are different, they are protected and there should be NO firearms laws at all short of a constitutinal amendment. On Jan 10, 2013 4:34 PM, "Eric Roberts" <[email protected]> wrote: > > We have no control over the drug manufacturers and harvesters...we do have > control over the gun and ammo manufacturers and control legal imports. > Most > guns used in crimes were legally obtained at one point and not a product of > some underground gun trafficking. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sam [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 8:34 AM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: Possible Executive Action - Gun Control > > > Are you saying there's been no focus on meth or heroin? > We have laws against them and that should be enough anyway. > Same as guns, you make them illegal and they go away, right? > > . > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 9:27 AM, GMoney <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > It actually has. If they'd quit wasting time and resources on pot, > > they can be even more affective against drugs that all of us agree are > > bad news, like meth. > > > > My only beef is with hand guns. I just think their size and lethality > > serve to make them perfect tools for crimes, and not very good for > > much else. I think we'd get along just fine without them. > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:359972 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
