I prefer to be on the team that fight all unconstitutional law. I also prefer not to be associated with most groups as then you get paited with a broad brush that doesn't often make sense.
This is one of the big reasons I've been ulling back from oathkeepers, too many real nuts on the out skirts of the group. On Jan 10, 2013 5:08 PM, "Maureen" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Are you sure? We just had a national referendum on public policy in the > form of an election. You might wanna consider how that turned out before > you put the fate of the Constitution in the hands of that same electorate. > > Here is a prediction for you. The current administration and Congress are > not going to propose any laws that bans or confiscates all guns or all > ammunition. They will propose stricter background checks and a ban on > large capacity magazines. They might introduce legislation calling for a > ban on so-called assault weapons. Very doubtful it would pass the House. > > If you want a fight, get on the team that makes sure the background > checks don't violate either the 2nd, 4th, or 5th amendment. Put your > energy where it can do some good. > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 4:16 PM, LRS Scout <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > If the opposition can get the numbers for an amendment that's fine, but > > let's be honest, that will never happen in our society and culture. With > > that as our basis we must look to solutions that are legal and > > constitutional. > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:359991 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
