Officers have multiple non lethal options available to them. They've turned into punks On Sep 9, 2014 1:39 PM, "Rick Faircloth" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Doesn't matter. He would easily have killed the cop without a gun. > Therefore, by law, > the cop had the right to use whatever force was necessary to stop the > "aggressor", > which Michael Brown was. If Michael Brown had chosen to drop to cease his > aggression when ordered, he would be alive today. So, he decided to risk > serious > injury or death, acting as a terrorist. He didn't even stop after the > first few rounds. > He chose to die rather than submit. He appropriately suffered the > consequences. > > > On 9/9/2014 1:35 PM, LRS Scout wrote: > > He didn't have a gun > > On Sep 9, 2014 1:34 PM, "Rick Faircloth" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> It used to be that men settled their differences with fists. But the > >> culture changed > >> and offenders begin with guns, hence the cops had to respond in kind. > >> > >> > >> On 9/9/2014 1:29 PM, LRS Scout wrote: > >>> I have. Only I didn't stand by idly, I used appropriate force levels. > >>> > >>> It's called escalation of force principals. > >>> > >>> You were in the military man, it would be a violation of ROE that would > >>> have ended with me in Leavenworth. > >>> > >>> Cops are supposed to be tough guys, brawling is supposed to be part of > >> the > >>> job. All go straight to the gun now. > >>> On Sep 9, 2014 1:14 PM, "Rick Faircloth" <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>>> Some kids, who are not holding firearms, should not be considered > >>>> "unarmed". > >>>> And, if you're referring to the 18-year-old, 290-lb, Ferguson thug > >>>> named, Michael, > >>>> then he is in no way, a "kid"... > >>>> > >>>> If you are assaulted by someone who is a threat to kill or seriously > >>>> injure you > >>>> by continuing their assault, then you have every right to kill the > >>>> aggressor. > >>>> > >>>> No one, and I mean NO ONE on this list would stand by with a gun in > >>>> their hand, > >>>> and watch their spouse or child being beaten by an aggressor who they > >>>> couldn't > >>>> handle physically, and refuse to shoot the aggressor and allow their > >>>> spouse or > >>>> child to possibly be killed and state that they couldn't intervene by > >>>> shooting > >>>> the aggressor because he didn't have a firearm. You don't have to > have a > >>>> gun > >>>> to kill someone. > >>>> > >>>> How many on this list would stand by and watch a loved one be killed > by > >> an > >>>> assailant who doesn't possess a firearm and was only beating them with > >>>> their > >>>> bare hands? > >>>> > >>>> Would you, Scout? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On 9/9/2014 1:05 PM, LRS Scout wrote: > >>>>> This is why we shoot unarmed kids..... > >>>>> On Sep 9, 2014 1:04 PM, "Rick Faircloth" <[email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>>> The women in your life, if you have any, would consider themselves > >>>>>> fortunate > >>>>>> to be treated the way I treat the women in my life, you asshole. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> If you have a woman in your life, would you advise her to start > >>>> punching, > >>>>>> spitting on, kicking, and slapping a male companion if she didn't > like > >>>>>> something > >>>>>> he said or did? If not, why not, you asshole. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 9/9/2014 12:59 PM, Scott Stroz wrote: > >>>>>>> No, she was not. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Nothing she did warranted being punched in the face. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> If you disagree, I feel sorry for any women in your life. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Rick Faircloth < > >>>>>> [email protected]> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> No, asshole, it reeks of "she was asking for trouble." > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Was she not asking for trouble, asshole? (Your word, Scott) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 9/9/2014 12:53 PM, Scott Stroz wrote: > >>>>>>>>> More proof you are an asshole. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> This reeks of 'she had it coming to her'. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Rick Faircloth < > >>>>>>>> [email protected]> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Women want equality. They don't want to be treated as "weaker." > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> These are the consequences of feminism. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> You can't have it both ways. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On 9/9/2014 10:33 AM, GMoney wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> What is with all these false equivalencies???? > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> All these arguments of "Well, IF she was a man..." are > completely > >>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant. She's NOT a man. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> ANd i know we want to treat anything and everything and > everyone > >> as > >>>>>>>>>> equals, > >>>>>>>>>>> but folks, there is simple nature at work here....and human > >> males, > >>>>>>>>>>> generally, are larger and stronger than females. I have no > >> problem > >>>>>> with > >>>>>>>>>> our > >>>>>>>>>>> laws and our general sense of moral decency reflecting that. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> If a woman half your size attacks you with a slap...you do NOT > >> have > >>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>> moral right to land a left hook that looked like something out > of > >>>>>>>> Tyson's > >>>>>>>>>>> PUnch Out. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> If that double standard bothers you......deal with it. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Vivec <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> Today the wife apologised for her role in the incident. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> If the wife was an athlete, and stronger than Rice, and the > same > >>>>>> thing > >>>>>>>>>> had > >>>>>>>>>>>> happened > >>>>>>>>>>>> I just don't think that anyone would be blaming her 100% for > >> what > >>>>>>>>>> happened. > >>>>>>>>>>>> There is a total skew when it comes to situations involving > >>>> violence > >>>>>>>>>>>> between a man and a woman. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I also did not see two punches. I saw a single slap when she > >>>> charged > >>>>>>>> him > >>>>>>>>>>>> with fists flying. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> This was not a passive abusive scenario. It also was not a > >>>> scenario > >>>>>>>>>> where > >>>>>>>>>>>> the wife was fighting back to protect herself, she was the > >>>>>> aggressor. > >> > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:372185 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
