Well, if you trust the likes of Al Sharpton more than you trust the police, you are on the same side as the terrorists in Ferguson.
On 9/9/2014 1:50 PM, LRS Scout wrote: > Most of what you're saying has been shown to be nonsense from early > reporting and even misinformation by the pd themselves. > On Sep 9, 2014 1:48 PM, "Rick Faircloth" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> And you know for a fact that this officer did? >> >> And if several rounds shot into Michael Brown, who was on drugs at the >> time, >> didn't stop him, do you think the officer should have risked his life by >> tazing Brown, rather than utilize sufficient force to stop him for sure? >> >> And all of that after Brown had apparently fought with the officer, >> fractured >> his head and attempted to take his firearm, which which, had he been able >> to >> get it, would have surely shot the officer to death. >> >> >> On 9/9/2014 1:43 PM, LRS Scout wrote: >>> Officers have multiple non lethal options available to them. >>> >>> They've turned into punks >>> On Sep 9, 2014 1:39 PM, "Rick Faircloth" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>> Doesn't matter. He would easily have killed the cop without a gun. >>>> Therefore, by law, >>>> the cop had the right to use whatever force was necessary to stop the >>>> "aggressor", >>>> which Michael Brown was. If Michael Brown had chosen to drop to cease >> his >>>> aggression when ordered, he would be alive today. So, he decided to risk >>>> serious >>>> injury or death, acting as a terrorist. He didn't even stop after the >>>> first few rounds. >>>> He chose to die rather than submit. He appropriately suffered the >>>> consequences. >>>> >>>> >>>> On 9/9/2014 1:35 PM, LRS Scout wrote: >>>>> He didn't have a gun >>>>> On Sep 9, 2014 1:34 PM, "Rick Faircloth" <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>>> It used to be that men settled their differences with fists. But the >>>>>> culture changed >>>>>> and offenders begin with guns, hence the cops had to respond in kind. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 9/9/2014 1:29 PM, LRS Scout wrote: >>>>>>> I have. Only I didn't stand by idly, I used appropriate force levels. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's called escalation of force principals. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You were in the military man, it would be a violation of ROE that >> would >>>>>>> have ended with me in Leavenworth. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cops are supposed to be tough guys, brawling is supposed to be part >> of >>>>>> the >>>>>>> job. All go straight to the gun now. >>>>>>> On Sep 9, 2014 1:14 PM, "Rick Faircloth" <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> Some kids, who are not holding firearms, should not be considered >>>>>>>> "unarmed". >>>>>>>> And, if you're referring to the 18-year-old, 290-lb, Ferguson thug >>>>>>>> named, Michael, >>>>>>>> then he is in no way, a "kid"... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If you are assaulted by someone who is a threat to kill or seriously >>>>>>>> injure you >>>>>>>> by continuing their assault, then you have every right to kill the >>>>>>>> aggressor. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No one, and I mean NO ONE on this list would stand by with a gun in >>>>>>>> their hand, >>>>>>>> and watch their spouse or child being beaten by an aggressor who >> they >>>>>>>> couldn't >>>>>>>> handle physically, and refuse to shoot the aggressor and allow their >>>>>>>> spouse or >>>>>>>> child to possibly be killed and state that they couldn't intervene >> by >>>>>>>> shooting >>>>>>>> the aggressor because he didn't have a firearm. You don't have to >>>> have a >>>>>>>> gun >>>>>>>> to kill someone. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> How many on this list would stand by and watch a loved one be killed >>>> by >>>>>> an >>>>>>>> assailant who doesn't possess a firearm and was only beating them >> with >>>>>>>> their >>>>>>>> bare hands? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Would you, Scout? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 9/9/2014 1:05 PM, LRS Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>> This is why we shoot unarmed kids..... >>>>>>>>> On Sep 9, 2014 1:04 PM, "Rick Faircloth" <[email protected] >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> The women in your life, if you have any, would consider themselves >>>>>>>>>> fortunate >>>>>>>>>> to be treated the way I treat the women in my life, you asshole. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> If you have a woman in your life, would you advise her to start >>>>>>>> punching, >>>>>>>>>> spitting on, kicking, and slapping a male companion if she didn't >>>> like >>>>>>>>>> something >>>>>>>>>> he said or did? If not, why not, you asshole. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 9/9/2014 12:59 PM, Scott Stroz wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> No, she was not. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Nothing she did warranted being punched in the face. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> If you disagree, I feel sorry for any women in your life. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Rick Faircloth < >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> No, asshole, it reeks of "she was asking for trouble." >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Was she not asking for trouble, asshole? (Your word, Scott) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/9/2014 12:53 PM, Scott Stroz wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> More proof you are an asshole. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> This reeks of 'she had it coming to her'. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Rick Faircloth < >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Women want equality. They don't want to be treated as >> "weaker." >>>>>>>>>>>>>> These are the consequences of feminism. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can't have it both ways. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/9/2014 10:33 AM, GMoney wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What is with all these false equivalencies???? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All these arguments of "Well, IF she was a man..." are >>>> completely >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant. She's NOT a man. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ANd i know we want to treat anything and everything and >>>> everyone >>>>>> as >>>>>>>>>>>>>> equals, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but folks, there is simple nature at work here....and human >>>>>> males, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generally, are larger and stronger than females. I have no >>>>>> problem >>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>>>>>> our >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> laws and our general sense of moral decency reflecting that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If a woman half your size attacks you with a slap...you do >> NOT >>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moral right to land a left hook that looked like something >> out >>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>> Tyson's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PUnch Out. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If that double standard bothers you......deal with it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Vivec <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Today the wife apologised for her role in the incident. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If the wife was an athlete, and stronger than Rice, and the >>>> same >>>>>>>>>> thing >>>>>>>>>>>>>> had >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happened >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just don't think that anyone would be blaming her 100% for >>>>>> what >>>>>>>>>>>>>> happened. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is a total skew when it comes to situations involving >>>>>>>> violence >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between a man and a woman. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I also did not see two punches. I saw a single slap when she >>>>>>>> charged >>>>>>>>>>>> him >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with fists flying. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This was not a passive abusive scenario. It also was not a >>>>>>>> scenario >>>>>>>>>>>>>> where >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the wife was fighting back to protect herself, she was the >>>>>>>>>> aggressor. >> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:372201 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
