You're right, Scout... When I'm attacked by a stranger, not by someone whose intent-to-harm I could guage, my response we be to insure, as quickly as possible, "I win, you lose."... The best way to insure that outcome is to inflict maximum damage to the attacker.
On 9/9/2014 3:34 PM, LRS Scout wrote: > You have no concept of proportional response. > > I'd say she paid for whatever minor infractions led to this. > On Sep 9, 2014 3:32 PM, "Rick Faircloth" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> No, because a woman's right to dress provocatively does not allow a man the >> right to rape her. >> >> However, a woman's assault on a man does allow a man the right to defend >> himself. >> >> In the same way, a man's sexual assault of a woman entitles her to >> defend herself. >> >> >> On 9/9/2014 3:10 PM, Scott Stroz wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Rick Faircloth < >> [email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> No, asshole, it reeks of "she was asking for trouble." >>>> >>> When a woman is raped would you say the same if she was dressed >>> provocatively? >>> >> >> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:372229 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
