Please, Sharpton is a fool. I'm no black bloc anarchist. Liberty from abusive policing is one of the reasons we have a country today. On Sep 9, 2014 2:06 PM, "Rick Faircloth" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Well, if you trust the likes of Al Sharpton more than you trust the police, > you are on the same side as the terrorists in Ferguson. > > > On 9/9/2014 1:50 PM, LRS Scout wrote: > > Most of what you're saying has been shown to be nonsense from early > > reporting and even misinformation by the pd themselves. > > On Sep 9, 2014 1:48 PM, "Rick Faircloth" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> And you know for a fact that this officer did? > >> > >> And if several rounds shot into Michael Brown, who was on drugs at the > >> time, > >> didn't stop him, do you think the officer should have risked his life by > >> tazing Brown, rather than utilize sufficient force to stop him for sure? > >> > >> And all of that after Brown had apparently fought with the officer, > >> fractured > >> his head and attempted to take his firearm, which which, had he been > able > >> to > >> get it, would have surely shot the officer to death. > >> > >> > >> On 9/9/2014 1:43 PM, LRS Scout wrote: > >>> Officers have multiple non lethal options available to them. > >>> > >>> They've turned into punks > >>> On Sep 9, 2014 1:39 PM, "Rick Faircloth" <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>>> Doesn't matter. He would easily have killed the cop without a gun. > >>>> Therefore, by law, > >>>> the cop had the right to use whatever force was necessary to stop the > >>>> "aggressor", > >>>> which Michael Brown was. If Michael Brown had chosen to drop to cease > >> his > >>>> aggression when ordered, he would be alive today. So, he decided to > risk > >>>> serious > >>>> injury or death, acting as a terrorist. He didn't even stop after the > >>>> first few rounds. > >>>> He chose to die rather than submit. He appropriately suffered the > >>>> consequences. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On 9/9/2014 1:35 PM, LRS Scout wrote: > >>>>> He didn't have a gun > >>>>> On Sep 9, 2014 1:34 PM, "Rick Faircloth" <[email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>>> It used to be that men settled their differences with fists. But the > >>>>>> culture changed > >>>>>> and offenders begin with guns, hence the cops had to respond in > kind. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 9/9/2014 1:29 PM, LRS Scout wrote: > >>>>>>> I have. Only I didn't stand by idly, I used appropriate force > levels. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> It's called escalation of force principals. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> You were in the military man, it would be a violation of ROE that > >> would > >>>>>>> have ended with me in Leavenworth. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Cops are supposed to be tough guys, brawling is supposed to be part > >> of > >>>>>> the > >>>>>>> job. All go straight to the gun now. > >>>>>>> On Sep 9, 2014 1:14 PM, "Rick Faircloth" <[email protected] > > > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> Some kids, who are not holding firearms, should not be considered > >>>>>>>> "unarmed". > >>>>>>>> And, if you're referring to the 18-year-old, 290-lb, Ferguson thug > >>>>>>>> named, Michael, > >>>>>>>> then he is in no way, a "kid"... > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> If you are assaulted by someone who is a threat to kill or > seriously > >>>>>>>> injure you > >>>>>>>> by continuing their assault, then you have every right to kill the > >>>>>>>> aggressor. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> No one, and I mean NO ONE on this list would stand by with a gun > in > >>>>>>>> their hand, > >>>>>>>> and watch their spouse or child being beaten by an aggressor who > >> they > >>>>>>>> couldn't > >>>>>>>> handle physically, and refuse to shoot the aggressor and allow > their > >>>>>>>> spouse or > >>>>>>>> child to possibly be killed and state that they couldn't intervene > >> by > >>>>>>>> shooting > >>>>>>>> the aggressor because he didn't have a firearm. You don't have to > >>>> have a > >>>>>>>> gun > >>>>>>>> to kill someone. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> How many on this list would stand by and watch a loved one be > killed > >>>> by > >>>>>> an > >>>>>>>> assailant who doesn't possess a firearm and was only beating them > >> with > >>>>>>>> their > >>>>>>>> bare hands? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Would you, Scout? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 9/9/2014 1:05 PM, LRS Scout wrote: > >>>>>>>>> This is why we shoot unarmed kids..... > >>>>>>>>> On Sep 9, 2014 1:04 PM, "Rick Faircloth" < > [email protected] > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> The women in your life, if you have any, would consider > themselves > >>>>>>>>>> fortunate > >>>>>>>>>> to be treated the way I treat the women in my life, you asshole. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> If you have a woman in your life, would you advise her to start > >>>>>>>> punching, > >>>>>>>>>> spitting on, kicking, and slapping a male companion if she > didn't > >>>> like > >>>>>>>>>> something > >>>>>>>>>> he said or did? If not, why not, you asshole. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On 9/9/2014 12:59 PM, Scott Stroz wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> No, she was not. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Nothing she did warranted being punched in the face. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> If you disagree, I feel sorry for any women in your life. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Rick Faircloth < > >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> No, asshole, it reeks of "she was asking for trouble." > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Was she not asking for trouble, asshole? (Your word, Scott) > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/9/2014 12:53 PM, Scott Stroz wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> More proof you are an asshole. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> This reeks of 'she had it coming to her'. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Rick Faircloth < > >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Women want equality. They don't want to be treated as > >> "weaker." > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> These are the consequences of feminism. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can't have it both ways. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/9/2014 10:33 AM, GMoney wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What is with all these false equivalencies???? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All these arguments of "Well, IF she was a man..." are > >>>> completely > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant. She's NOT a man. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ANd i know we want to treat anything and everything and > >>>> everyone > >>>>>> as > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> equals, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but folks, there is simple nature at work here....and human > >>>>>> males, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generally, are larger and stronger than females. I have no > >>>>>> problem > >>>>>>>>>> with > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> our > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> laws and our general sense of moral decency reflecting > that. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If a woman half your size attacks you with a slap...you do > >> NOT > >>>>>> have > >>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moral right to land a left hook that looked like something > >> out > >>>> of > >>>>>>>>>>>> Tyson's > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PUnch Out. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If that double standard bothers you......deal with it. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Vivec <[email protected]> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Today the wife apologised for her role in the incident. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If the wife was an athlete, and stronger than Rice, and > the > >>>> same > >>>>>>>>>> thing > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> had > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happened > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just don't think that anyone would be blaming her 100% > for > >>>>>> what > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> happened. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is a total skew when it comes to situations > involving > >>>>>>>> violence > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between a man and a woman. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I also did not see two punches. I saw a single slap when > she > >>>>>>>> charged > >>>>>>>>>>>> him > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with fists flying. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This was not a passive abusive scenario. It also was not a > >>>>>>>> scenario > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> where > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the wife was fighting back to protect herself, she was the > >>>>>>>>>> aggressor. > >> > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:372205 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
