Most of what you're saying has been shown to be nonsense from early reporting and even misinformation by the pd themselves. On Sep 9, 2014 1:48 PM, "Rick Faircloth" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > And you know for a fact that this officer did? > > And if several rounds shot into Michael Brown, who was on drugs at the > time, > didn't stop him, do you think the officer should have risked his life by > tazing Brown, rather than utilize sufficient force to stop him for sure? > > And all of that after Brown had apparently fought with the officer, > fractured > his head and attempted to take his firearm, which which, had he been able > to > get it, would have surely shot the officer to death. > > > On 9/9/2014 1:43 PM, LRS Scout wrote: > > Officers have multiple non lethal options available to them. > > > > They've turned into punks > > On Sep 9, 2014 1:39 PM, "Rick Faircloth" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> Doesn't matter. He would easily have killed the cop without a gun. > >> Therefore, by law, > >> the cop had the right to use whatever force was necessary to stop the > >> "aggressor", > >> which Michael Brown was. If Michael Brown had chosen to drop to cease > his > >> aggression when ordered, he would be alive today. So, he decided to risk > >> serious > >> injury or death, acting as a terrorist. He didn't even stop after the > >> first few rounds. > >> He chose to die rather than submit. He appropriately suffered the > >> consequences. > >> > >> > >> On 9/9/2014 1:35 PM, LRS Scout wrote: > >>> He didn't have a gun > >>> On Sep 9, 2014 1:34 PM, "Rick Faircloth" <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>>> It used to be that men settled their differences with fists. But the > >>>> culture changed > >>>> and offenders begin with guns, hence the cops had to respond in kind. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On 9/9/2014 1:29 PM, LRS Scout wrote: > >>>>> I have. Only I didn't stand by idly, I used appropriate force levels. > >>>>> > >>>>> It's called escalation of force principals. > >>>>> > >>>>> You were in the military man, it would be a violation of ROE that > would > >>>>> have ended with me in Leavenworth. > >>>>> > >>>>> Cops are supposed to be tough guys, brawling is supposed to be part > of > >>>> the > >>>>> job. All go straight to the gun now. > >>>>> On Sep 9, 2014 1:14 PM, "Rick Faircloth" <[email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>>> Some kids, who are not holding firearms, should not be considered > >>>>>> "unarmed". > >>>>>> And, if you're referring to the 18-year-old, 290-lb, Ferguson thug > >>>>>> named, Michael, > >>>>>> then he is in no way, a "kid"... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> If you are assaulted by someone who is a threat to kill or seriously > >>>>>> injure you > >>>>>> by continuing their assault, then you have every right to kill the > >>>>>> aggressor. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> No one, and I mean NO ONE on this list would stand by with a gun in > >>>>>> their hand, > >>>>>> and watch their spouse or child being beaten by an aggressor who > they > >>>>>> couldn't > >>>>>> handle physically, and refuse to shoot the aggressor and allow their > >>>>>> spouse or > >>>>>> child to possibly be killed and state that they couldn't intervene > by > >>>>>> shooting > >>>>>> the aggressor because he didn't have a firearm. You don't have to > >> have a > >>>>>> gun > >>>>>> to kill someone. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> How many on this list would stand by and watch a loved one be killed > >> by > >>>> an > >>>>>> assailant who doesn't possess a firearm and was only beating them > with > >>>>>> their > >>>>>> bare hands? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Would you, Scout? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 9/9/2014 1:05 PM, LRS Scout wrote: > >>>>>>> This is why we shoot unarmed kids..... > >>>>>>> On Sep 9, 2014 1:04 PM, "Rick Faircloth" <[email protected] > > > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> The women in your life, if you have any, would consider themselves > >>>>>>>> fortunate > >>>>>>>> to be treated the way I treat the women in my life, you asshole. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> If you have a woman in your life, would you advise her to start > >>>>>> punching, > >>>>>>>> spitting on, kicking, and slapping a male companion if she didn't > >> like > >>>>>>>> something > >>>>>>>> he said or did? If not, why not, you asshole. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 9/9/2014 12:59 PM, Scott Stroz wrote: > >>>>>>>>> No, she was not. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Nothing she did warranted being punched in the face. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> If you disagree, I feel sorry for any women in your life. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Rick Faircloth < > >>>>>>>> [email protected]> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> No, asshole, it reeks of "she was asking for trouble." > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Was she not asking for trouble, asshole? (Your word, Scott) > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On 9/9/2014 12:53 PM, Scott Stroz wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> More proof you are an asshole. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> This reeks of 'she had it coming to her'. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Rick Faircloth < > >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Women want equality. They don't want to be treated as > "weaker." > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> These are the consequences of feminism. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> You can't have it both ways. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/9/2014 10:33 AM, GMoney wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> What is with all these false equivalencies???? > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> All these arguments of "Well, IF she was a man..." are > >> completely > >>>>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant. She's NOT a man. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ANd i know we want to treat anything and everything and > >> everyone > >>>> as > >>>>>>>>>>>> equals, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> but folks, there is simple nature at work here....and human > >>>> males, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> generally, are larger and stronger than females. I have no > >>>> problem > >>>>>>>> with > >>>>>>>>>>>> our > >>>>>>>>>>>>> laws and our general sense of moral decency reflecting that. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> If a woman half your size attacks you with a slap...you do > NOT > >>>> have > >>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>> moral right to land a left hook that looked like something > out > >> of > >>>>>>>>>> Tyson's > >>>>>>>>>>>>> PUnch Out. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> If that double standard bothers you......deal with it. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Vivec <[email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Today the wife apologised for her role in the incident. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If the wife was an athlete, and stronger than Rice, and the > >> same > >>>>>>>> thing > >>>>>>>>>>>> had > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> happened > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just don't think that anyone would be blaming her 100% for > >>>> what > >>>>>>>>>>>> happened. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is a total skew when it comes to situations involving > >>>>>> violence > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> between a man and a woman. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I also did not see two punches. I saw a single slap when she > >>>>>> charged > >>>>>>>>>> him > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> with fists flying. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> This was not a passive abusive scenario. It also was not a > >>>>>> scenario > >>>>>>>>>>>> where > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the wife was fighting back to protect herself, she was the > >>>>>>>> aggressor. > >> > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:372189 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
