Do you have any evidence, besides your interpretation of the situation, that there was abusive policing in the Michael Brown incident?
On 9/9/2014 2:10 PM, LRS Scout wrote: > Please, Sharpton is a fool. I'm no black bloc anarchist. > > Liberty from abusive policing is one of the reasons we have a country today. > On Sep 9, 2014 2:06 PM, "Rick Faircloth" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Well, if you trust the likes of Al Sharpton more than you trust the police, >> you are on the same side as the terrorists in Ferguson. >> >> >> On 9/9/2014 1:50 PM, LRS Scout wrote: >>> Most of what you're saying has been shown to be nonsense from early >>> reporting and even misinformation by the pd themselves. >>> On Sep 9, 2014 1:48 PM, "Rick Faircloth" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>> And you know for a fact that this officer did? >>>> >>>> And if several rounds shot into Michael Brown, who was on drugs at the >>>> time, >>>> didn't stop him, do you think the officer should have risked his life by >>>> tazing Brown, rather than utilize sufficient force to stop him for sure? >>>> >>>> And all of that after Brown had apparently fought with the officer, >>>> fractured >>>> his head and attempted to take his firearm, which which, had he been >> able >>>> to >>>> get it, would have surely shot the officer to death. >>>> >>>> >>>> On 9/9/2014 1:43 PM, LRS Scout wrote: >>>>> Officers have multiple non lethal options available to them. >>>>> >>>>> They've turned into punks >>>>> On Sep 9, 2014 1:39 PM, "Rick Faircloth" <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>>> Doesn't matter. He would easily have killed the cop without a gun. >>>>>> Therefore, by law, >>>>>> the cop had the right to use whatever force was necessary to stop the >>>>>> "aggressor", >>>>>> which Michael Brown was. If Michael Brown had chosen to drop to cease >>>> his >>>>>> aggression when ordered, he would be alive today. So, he decided to >> risk >>>>>> serious >>>>>> injury or death, acting as a terrorist. He didn't even stop after the >>>>>> first few rounds. >>>>>> He chose to die rather than submit. He appropriately suffered the >>>>>> consequences. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 9/9/2014 1:35 PM, LRS Scout wrote: >>>>>>> He didn't have a gun >>>>>>> On Sep 9, 2014 1:34 PM, "Rick Faircloth" <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> It used to be that men settled their differences with fists. But the >>>>>>>> culture changed >>>>>>>> and offenders begin with guns, hence the cops had to respond in >> kind. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 9/9/2014 1:29 PM, LRS Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>> I have. Only I didn't stand by idly, I used appropriate force >> levels. >>>>>>>>> It's called escalation of force principals. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You were in the military man, it would be a violation of ROE that >>>> would >>>>>>>>> have ended with me in Leavenworth. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cops are supposed to be tough guys, brawling is supposed to be part >>>> of >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> job. All go straight to the gun now. >>>>>>>>> On Sep 9, 2014 1:14 PM, "Rick Faircloth" <[email protected] >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Some kids, who are not holding firearms, should not be considered >>>>>>>>>> "unarmed". >>>>>>>>>> And, if you're referring to the 18-year-old, 290-lb, Ferguson thug >>>>>>>>>> named, Michael, >>>>>>>>>> then he is in no way, a "kid"... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> If you are assaulted by someone who is a threat to kill or >> seriously >>>>>>>>>> injure you >>>>>>>>>> by continuing their assault, then you have every right to kill the >>>>>>>>>> aggressor. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> No one, and I mean NO ONE on this list would stand by with a gun >> in >>>>>>>>>> their hand, >>>>>>>>>> and watch their spouse or child being beaten by an aggressor who >>>> they >>>>>>>>>> couldn't >>>>>>>>>> handle physically, and refuse to shoot the aggressor and allow >> their >>>>>>>>>> spouse or >>>>>>>>>> child to possibly be killed and state that they couldn't intervene >>>> by >>>>>>>>>> shooting >>>>>>>>>> the aggressor because he didn't have a firearm. You don't have to >>>>>> have a >>>>>>>>>> gun >>>>>>>>>> to kill someone. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> How many on this list would stand by and watch a loved one be >> killed >>>>>> by >>>>>>>> an >>>>>>>>>> assailant who doesn't possess a firearm and was only beating them >>>> with >>>>>>>>>> their >>>>>>>>>> bare hands? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Would you, Scout? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 9/9/2014 1:05 PM, LRS Scout wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> This is why we shoot unarmed kids..... >>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 9, 2014 1:04 PM, "Rick Faircloth" < >> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> The women in your life, if you have any, would consider >> themselves >>>>>>>>>>>> fortunate >>>>>>>>>>>> to be treated the way I treat the women in my life, you asshole. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> If you have a woman in your life, would you advise her to start >>>>>>>>>> punching, >>>>>>>>>>>> spitting on, kicking, and slapping a male companion if she >> didn't >>>>>> like >>>>>>>>>>>> something >>>>>>>>>>>> he said or did? If not, why not, you asshole. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/9/2014 12:59 PM, Scott Stroz wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> No, she was not. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing she did warranted being punched in the face. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> If you disagree, I feel sorry for any women in your life. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Rick Faircloth < >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, asshole, it reeks of "she was asking for trouble." >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Was she not asking for trouble, asshole? (Your word, Scott) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/9/2014 12:53 PM, Scott Stroz wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> More proof you are an asshole. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This reeks of 'she had it coming to her'. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Rick Faircloth < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Women want equality. They don't want to be treated as >>>> "weaker." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> These are the consequences of feminism. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can't have it both ways. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/9/2014 10:33 AM, GMoney wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What is with all these false equivalencies???? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All these arguments of "Well, IF she was a man..." are >>>>>> completely >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> irrelevant. She's NOT a man. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ANd i know we want to treat anything and everything and >>>>>> everyone >>>>>>>> as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> equals, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but folks, there is simple nature at work here....and human >>>>>>>> males, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generally, are larger and stronger than females. I have no >>>>>>>> problem >>>>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> our >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> laws and our general sense of moral decency reflecting >> that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If a woman half your size attacks you with a slap...you do >>>> NOT >>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moral right to land a left hook that looked like something >>>> out >>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tyson's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PUnch Out. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If that double standard bothers you......deal with it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Vivec <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Today the wife apologised for her role in the incident. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If the wife was an athlete, and stronger than Rice, and >> the >>>>>> same >>>>>>>>>>>> thing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> had >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happened >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just don't think that anyone would be blaming her 100% >> for >>>>>>>> what >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happened. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is a total skew when it comes to situations >> involving >>>>>>>>>> violence >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between a man and a woman. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I also did not see two punches. I saw a single slap when >> she >>>>>>>>>> charged >>>>>>>>>>>>>> him >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with fists flying. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This was not a passive abusive scenario. It also was not a >>>>>>>>>> scenario >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> where >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the wife was fighting back to protect herself, she was the >>>>>>>>>>>> aggressor. >> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:372210 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/unsubscribe.cfm
