> This is where it comes down to rights. It's convenient for me to steal > and not pay. It's convenient for me to mow over a pedestrian instead of > slowing down. In both cases I simply cannot because my rights to > convenience do not overtake the rights of the store owner or the ped. If > you feel the child in the womb has a soul, then you feel that > convenience is not enough of an excuse to kill the child.
Ok, here is where you crossed the line over to religion. Souls are a religious notion and have no place in the LAWS of the us. You are absolutely entitled to the opinion that a soul is the reason that a fetus should never be aborted, but this is a religious notion, and has no business in the laws of the US. > I assume you > don't feel that the child has a real soul yet, or is really alive. > Therefore, we disagree. (And I tried VERY hard to word that in a > non-accusatory fashion - don't consider it an attack - I'm simply > pointing out how our different views of the child in the womb leads us > to different feelings on whether it's acceptable to have an abortion or > not.) Well, now, morally I am torn on the abortion issue, although I feel its often "for the best". But my morals have nothing to do with what other people should do. I recognize that. I dont' consider anything an attack unless you say something about ME as opposed to my arguments. So we are all happy here. ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
