Hmm, I'm not sure I'd agree with some of your points regarding lost advantages, I 
don't use PHP myself, but I haven't heard others confirm your feeling that PHP is as 
quickly learned and effectively used as CF, and I can't speak to PHP community support 
- but the CF community support is huge!

*HOWEVER* I'm not trying to taunt you into a debate! =) Thanks for sharing your 
thoughts on this, it's good to know what's on your mind!

-Vern

-----Original Message-----
From: Wayne Putterill [mailto:wayne@;welshnet.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 3:02 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: My last CF site?


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vernon Viehe [mailto:vviehe@;macromedia.com] 
> Sent: 04 November 2002 21:34
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: My last CF site?
> 
> 
> It sounds like what you were saying is that lower-cost 
> options have become more attractive to you in a smaller-scale 
> setting, and you don't feel like we're addressing that shift, 
> but instead developing more support for enterprise uses of CF.
> 
> Did I get the gist right?
> 
> -Vern

Pretty much, I suppose you could say that CF has lost it's traditional
advantages of fast dev time, community support etc. and up against a
free product it's a no brainer. PHPs major drawback was the lack of a
good editor, there seem to be a few OK ones about now though (although
nothing to compare with CF Studio), ironically DWMX seems to be as good
as it gets for PHP at the moment.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wayne Putterill [mailto:wayne@;welshnet.co.uk]
> Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 11:55 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: My last CF site?
> 
> 
> > From: Vernon Viehe [mailto:vviehe@;macromedia.com]
> > Hey Wayne,
> > 
> > We dropped the price of CFMX Pro from CF 5 Pro. Enterprise &
> > subscription did go up by $4, but I doubt you're referring to that. 
> > 
> > We certainly are trying to bolster the enterprise market by
> > offering CFMX on J2EE, but that's not really a move away from 
> > anything, it's adding to.
> > 
> > Did I missunderstand, or can you elaborate on your perception a bit?
> 
> Well the first part of my post is fairly simple, I tend to 
> work as a contract developer for various design houses in my 
> area, they no longer use CF as they are moving to PHP - if I 
> want the work I have to follow. There are still two CF shops 
> around here but they concentrate on the "big sites" and have 
> development teams of 10 or more people.
> 
> The other type of work I do are sites for smaller companies, 
> for these I do everything from initial design to search 
> engine submission. The usual budget is 2-5k for a fairly 
> straightforward dynamic site. Now it doesn't matter to me how 
> brilliant web services or flash integration etc. are, my 
> customers don't need it and they certainly can't afford it. 
> 
> The fact is I can offer them more for the same money by using 
> PHP, it doesn't take any longer to code once you are used to 
> it and there is a far wider selection of excellent quality 
> free code out there I can use compared to CF. 
> 
> Hosting is another issue, I can get a dedicated server for 
> �35 a month set up with Linux/Apache/MySql/PHP, to use CF I 
> have to upgrade the server and spend a not inconsiderable 
> amount on software. No contest.
> 
> I am sad about it, I was converted to CF by Mr Forte himself 
> at a conference when version 3 came out, I have done dozens 
> of sites in CF but I find it harder and harder to justify 
> using it - even to myself.
> 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wayne Putterill [mailto:wayne@;welshnet.co.uk]
> > Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 6:58 AM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: My last CF site?
> > 
> > 
> > I fear that I may have coded my last CF site, all the work in
> > my area seems to be moving towards PHP - and much as I love 
> > CF I have to pay the bills. The other problem is that MM seem 
> > to be moving CF towards the expensive enterprise sites rather 
> > than the small companies that are my usual customers, even 
> > the faster development time/cost for CF argument no longer 
> > really applies as you can code (or should that read
> > Drag'n'Drop) PHP as quickly as CF in DWMX. 
> > 
> > On the bright side PHP is nothing like as bad as I imagined
> > it would be, I particularly like using the Object oriented 
> > stuff to reuse code.
> > 
> > But the important thing is - will I have to stop reading the
> > CF Community list?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm

Reply via email to