Actually, Clark is a pretty easy target when it comes foreign policy, what with his penchant for defying the state department and swaping hats with a Bosnian war criminal.  Not to mention that he likes to get strange phone calls about Saddam from nonexistent think tanks.  

I don't know why Democrats like this guy.  He's a Clinton sock puppet and isn't even a registered Democrat yet.  Nevermind that 2 years ago he was singing praises for the entire Bush administation.  

Clark is only doing well because moderate Democrats think he can beat Bush, and for Democrats that's what it's all about in 04.  It's not about their guy winning, they don't care who it is.  If Stalin were around and could beat Bush the Democrats would run him.  They hate Bush so much that all they want is for him to lose, they don't care who it is that wins, as long as it's not Bush.

>Have to admit though it would be a very strong ticket. Difficult for the
>Shrubbies to assail Clark on foreign policy or the military and Clinton on
>domestic issues.
>
>larry
>
>At 02:59 PM 10/3/2003, you wrote:
>>That's not the real question. The real one is if the data is true. If so, then
>>we can have Clark/Clinton as a ticket (Clinton as VP) and a few years from now
>>she'll be president.
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to