Show me irrefutable proof Bush lied, and not partisan rhetoric and i'll listen.  Quoting the Howard Dean blog doesn't count either. Otherwise, I've heard it all before.  

Let's see two years ago sings praise....now sees ultimate power dangled, becomes Clinton sock puppet.

>Hmmm...  Clinton sock puppet... Singing praises for the Bush
>administration...  how is it that these two things can co-exist?
>
>Talk about hatred of a politico, four years ago the Republican
>Congress impeached the President becuase he lied about having sex out
>of marriage, but they're not the least bit concerned that Bush-lite
>has lied and continues to lie about the war in Iraq even as soldiers
>continue to die.  Really now, Kevin.
>
>- Matt Small
  
>----- Original Message -----
  
>From: Kevin Schmidt
  
>To: CF-Community
  
>Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 3:36 PM
  
>Subject: Re:President... Clinton?
>
>
  
>Actually, Clark is a pretty easy target when it comes foreign policy,
>what with his penchant for defying the state department and swaping
>hats with a Bosnian war criminal.  Not to mention that he likes to get
>strange phone calls about Saddam from nonexistent think tanks.  
>
  
>I don't know why Democrats like this guy.  He's a Clinton sock puppet
>and isn't even a registered Democrat yet.  Nevermind that 2 years ago
>he was singing praises for the entire Bush administation.  
>
  
>Clark is only doing well because moderate Democrats think he can beat
>Bush, and for Democrats that's what it's all about in 04.  It's not
>about their guy winning, they don't care who it is.  If Stalin were
>around and could beat Bush the Democrats would run him.  They hate
>Bush so much that all they want is for him to lose, they don't care
>who it is that wins, as long as it's not Bush.
>
  
>>Have to admit though it would be a very strong ticket. Difficult for
>the
  
>>Shrubbies to assail Clark on foreign policy or the military and
>Clinton on
  
>>domestic issues.
  
>>
  
>>larry
  
>>
  
>>At 02:59 PM 10/3/2003, you wrote:
  
>>>That's not the real question. The real one is if the data is true.
>If so, then
  
>>>we can have Clark/Clinton as a ticket (Clinton as VP) and a few
>years from now
  
>>>she'll be president.
  
>>
  
>>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to