-Kevin
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 3:01 PM
Subject: Re:President... Clinton?
> That's not a lie.
>
>
> >"The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently
> >sought
> >significant quantities of uranium from Africa."
> >
> >- Jim
> >
> >Kevin Schmidt wrote:
> >
> >>Show me irrefutable proof Bush lied, and not partisan rhetoric and
> >i'll listen. Quoting the Howard Dean blog doesn't count either.
> >Otherwise, I've heard it all before.
> >>
> >>Let's see two years ago sings praise....now sees ultimate power
> >dangled, becomes Clinton sock puppet.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Hmmm... Clinton sock puppet... Singing praises for the Bush
> >>>administration... how is it that these two things can co-exist?
> >>>
> >>>Talk about hatred of a politico, four years ago the Republican
> >>>Congress impeached the President becuase he lied about having sex
> >out
> >>>of marriage, but they're not the least bit concerned that Bush-lite
> >
> >>>has lied and continues to lie about the war in Iraq even as soldiers
> >
> >>>continue to die. Really now, Kevin.
> >>>
> >>>- Matt Small
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>----- Original Message -----
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>From: Kevin Schmidt
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>To: CF-Community
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 3:36 PM
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Subject: Re:President... Clinton?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Actually, Clark is a pretty easy target when it comes foreign policy,
> >
> >>>what with his penchant for defying the state department and swaping
> >
> >>>hats with a Bosnian war criminal. Not to mention that he likes to
> >get
> >>>strange phone calls about Saddam from nonexistent think tanks.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>I don't know why Democrats like this guy. He's a Clinton sock
> >puppet
> >>>and isn't even a registered Democrat yet. Nevermind that 2 years
> >ago
> >>>he was singing praises for the entire Bush administation.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Clark is only doing well because moderate Democrats think he can
> >beat
> >>>Bush, and for Democrats that's what it's all about in 04. It's not
> >
> >>>about their guy winning, they don't care who it is. If Stalin were
> >
> >>>around and could beat Bush the Democrats would run him. They hate
> >>>Bush so much that all they want is for him to lose, they don't care
> >
> >>>who it is that wins, as long as it's not Bush.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>>Have to admit though it would be a very strong ticket. Difficult
> >for
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>the
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>>Shrubbies to assail Clark on foreign policy or the military and
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>Clinton on
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>>domestic issues.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>>larry
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>>At 02:59 PM 10/3/2003, you wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>>>That's not the real question. The real one is if the data is true.
> >
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>If so, then
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>>>we can have Clark/Clinton as a ticket (Clinton as VP) and a few
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>years from now
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>>>she'll be president.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
