>"The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently
>sought
>significant quantities of uranium from Africa."
>
>- Jim
>
>Kevin Schmidt wrote:
>
>>Show me irrefutable proof Bush lied, and not partisan rhetoric and
>i'll listen. Quoting the Howard Dean blog doesn't count either.
>Otherwise, I've heard it all before.
>>
>>Let's see two years ago sings praise....now sees ultimate power
>dangled, becomes Clinton sock puppet.
>>
>>
>>
>>>Hmmm... Clinton sock puppet... Singing praises for the Bush
>>>administration... how is it that these two things can co-exist?
>>>
>>>Talk about hatred of a politico, four years ago the Republican
>>>Congress impeached the President becuase he lied about having sex
>out
>>>of marriage, but they're not the least bit concerned that Bush-lite
>
>>>has lied and continues to lie about the war in Iraq even as soldiers
>
>>>continue to die. Really now, Kevin.
>>>
>>>- Matt Small
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>From: Kevin Schmidt
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>To: CF-Community
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 3:36 PM
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Subject: Re:President... Clinton?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Actually, Clark is a pretty easy target when it comes foreign policy,
>
>>>what with his penchant for defying the state department and swaping
>
>>>hats with a Bosnian war criminal. Not to mention that he likes to
>get
>>>strange phone calls about Saddam from nonexistent think tanks.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>I don't know why Democrats like this guy. He's a Clinton sock
>puppet
>>>and isn't even a registered Democrat yet. Nevermind that 2 years
>ago
>>>he was singing praises for the entire Bush administation.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Clark is only doing well because moderate Democrats think he can
>beat
>>>Bush, and for Democrats that's what it's all about in 04. It's not
>
>>>about their guy winning, they don't care who it is. If Stalin were
>
>>>around and could beat Bush the Democrats would run him. They hate
>>>Bush so much that all they want is for him to lose, they don't care
>
>>>who it is that wins, as long as it's not Bush.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>Have to admit though it would be a very strong ticket. Difficult
>for
>>>>
>>>>
>>>the
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>Shrubbies to assail Clark on foreign policy or the military and
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Clinton on
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>domestic issues.
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>larry
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>At 02:59 PM 10/3/2003, you wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>That's not the real question. The real one is if the data is true.
>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>If so, then
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>we can have Clark/Clinton as a ticket (Clinton as VP) and a few
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>years from now
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>she'll be president.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
