and leaks in retribution to the CIA agent.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 3:01 PM
Subject: Re:President... Clinton?
| That's not a lie.
|
|
| >"The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently
| >sought
| >significant quantities of uranium from Africa."
| >
| >- Jim
| >
| >Kevin Schmidt wrote:
| >
| >>Show me irrefutable proof Bush lied, and not partisan rhetoric and
| >i'll listen. Quoting the Howard Dean blog doesn't count either.
| >Otherwise, I've heard it all before.
| >>
| >>Let's see two years ago sings praise....now sees ultimate power
| >dangled, becomes Clinton sock puppet.
| >>
| >>
| >>
| >>>Hmmm... Clinton sock puppet... Singing praises for the Bush
| >>>administration... how is it that these two things can co-exist?
| >>>
| >>>Talk about hatred of a politico, four years ago the Republican
| >>>Congress impeached the President becuase he lied about having sex
| >out
| >>>of marriage, but they're not the least bit concerned that Bush-lite
| >
| >>>has lied and continues to lie about the war in Iraq even as soldiers
| >
| >>>continue to die. Really now, Kevin.
| >>>
| >>>- Matt Small
| >>>
| >>>
| >>
| >>
| >>
| >>>----- Original Message -----
| >>>
| >>>
| >>
| >>
| >>
| >>>From: Kevin Schmidt
| >>>
| >>>
| >>
| >>
| >>
| >>>To: CF-Community
| >>>
| >>>
| >>
| >>
| >>
| >>>Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 3:36 PM
| >>>
| >>>
| >>
| >>
| >>
| >>>Subject: Re:President... Clinton?
| >>>
| >>>
| >>>
| >>>
| >>
| >>
| >>
| >>>Actually, Clark is a pretty easy target when it comes foreign policy,
| >
| >>>what with his penchant for defying the state department and swaping
| >
| >>>hats with a Bosnian war criminal. Not to mention that he likes to
| >get
| >>>strange phone calls about Saddam from nonexistent think tanks.
| >>>
| >>>
| >>>
| >>
| >>
| >>
| >>>I don't know why Democrats like this guy. He's a Clinton sock
| >puppet
| >>>and isn't even a registered Democrat yet. Nevermind that 2 years
| >ago
| >>>he was singing praises for the entire Bush administation.
| >>>
| >>>
| >>>
| >>
| >>
| >>
| >>>Clark is only doing well because moderate Democrats think he can
| >beat
| >>>Bush, and for Democrats that's what it's all about in 04. It's not
| >
| >>>about their guy winning, they don't care who it is. If Stalin were
| >
| >>>around and could beat Bush the Democrats would run him. They hate
| >>>Bush so much that all they want is for him to lose, they don't care
| >
| >>>who it is that wins, as long as it's not Bush.
| >>>
| >>>
| >>>
| >>
| >>
| >>
| >>>>Have to admit though it would be a very strong ticket. Difficult
| >for
| >>>>
| >>>>
| >>>the
| >>>
| >>>
| >>
| >>
| >>
| >>>>Shrubbies to assail Clark on foreign policy or the military and
| >>>>
| >>>>
| >>>Clinton on
| >>>
| >>>
| >>
| >>
| >>
| >>>>domestic issues.
| >>>>
| >>>>
| >>
| >>
| >>
| >>
| >>
| >>
| >>>>larry
| >>>>
| >>>>
| >>
| >>
| >>
| >>
| >>
| >>
| >>>>At 02:59 PM 10/3/2003, you wrote:
| >>>>
| >>>>
| >>
| >>
| >>
| >>>>>That's not the real question. The real one is if the data is true.
| >
| >>>>>
| >>>>>
| >>>If so, then
| >>>
| >>>
| >>
| >>
| >>
| >>>>>we can have Clark/Clinton as a ticket (Clinton as VP) and a few
| >>>>>
| >>>>>
| >>>years from now
| >>>
| >>>
| >>
| >>
| >>
| >>>>>she'll be president.
| >>>>>
| >>>>>
| >>
| >>
| >>
| >>
| >>
| >>
| >
|
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
