significant quantities of uranium from Africa."
- Jim
Kevin Schmidt wrote:
>Show me irrefutable proof Bush lied, and not partisan rhetoric and i'll listen. Quoting the Howard Dean blog doesn't count either. Otherwise, I've heard it all before.
>
>Let's see two years ago sings praise....now sees ultimate power dangled, becomes Clinton sock puppet.
>
>
>
>>Hmmm... Clinton sock puppet... Singing praises for the Bush
>>administration... how is it that these two things can co-exist?
>>
>>Talk about hatred of a politico, four years ago the Republican
>>Congress impeached the President becuase he lied about having sex out
>>of marriage, but they're not the least bit concerned that Bush-lite
>>has lied and continues to lie about the war in Iraq even as soldiers
>>continue to die. Really now, Kevin.
>>
>>- Matt Small
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>From: Kevin Schmidt
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>To: CF-Community
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 3:36 PM
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>Subject: Re:President... Clinton?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>Actually, Clark is a pretty easy target when it comes foreign policy,
>>what with his penchant for defying the state department and swaping
>>hats with a Bosnian war criminal. Not to mention that he likes to get
>>strange phone calls about Saddam from nonexistent think tanks.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>I don't know why Democrats like this guy. He's a Clinton sock puppet
>>and isn't even a registered Democrat yet. Nevermind that 2 years ago
>>he was singing praises for the entire Bush administation.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>Clark is only doing well because moderate Democrats think he can beat
>>Bush, and for Democrats that's what it's all about in 04. It's not
>>about their guy winning, they don't care who it is. If Stalin were
>>around and could beat Bush the Democrats would run him. They hate
>>Bush so much that all they want is for him to lose, they don't care
>>who it is that wins, as long as it's not Bush.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>>Have to admit though it would be a very strong ticket. Difficult for
>>>
>>>
>>the
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>>Shrubbies to assail Clark on foreign policy or the military and
>>>
>>>
>>Clinton on
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>>domestic issues.
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>>larry
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>>At 02:59 PM 10/3/2003, you wrote:
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>>>>That's not the real question. The real one is if the data is true.
>>>>
>>>>
>>If so, then
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>>>we can have Clark/Clinton as a ticket (Clinton as VP) and a few
>>>>
>>>>
>>years from now
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>>>she'll be president.
>>>>
>>>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
