> Why not? Given the occasional need to customize/recompile Apache? Are > there > any "state secrets" in there? The modules used to come with source on > Solaris, if I recall correctly. I realize that newer version of Apache > tend > to use dynamically loaded modules, but there are enough variations on > Apache > to warrant the distribution of the module source, I'd think. > > If this isn't going to happen, what would be the likelihood that we could > get an "unofficial" module build for Apache on OS X? After all, several > Macromedians are running CF MX on OS X using the CF MX web server, right? > Surely they'd like to be able to use a "real" web server? >
I tried to push for release of the source code. After review, we cannot release the source code to the modules, as there are components in there which are "state secrets". Remember, CF no longer has it's own Apache modules, we use JRun's which means is JRun says "No module for you" then we get zero module. As I am one of the people running on OS/X, I would be tempted to recompile the module, however, my time available for "Nice to do Tasks" is about 0 until sometime in 2005. Yes. There are enough Apache variations to warrant this. Will the source code be released: Not at this time. -jesse ______________________________________________________________________ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-linux%40houseoffusion.com/ To Unsubscribe visit http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_linux or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
