Uh CFMX on OS/X is completely, totally, and not even remotely supported. It is a kludge on you can do if you want, but Macromedia in NO WAY supports it.
Therefore, and Apache module on OS/X is N/A Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED] Macromedia Server Development Unix/Linux "special guy" > -----Original Message----- > From: Leon Oosterwijk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 12:52 PM > To: CF-Linux > Subject: RE: Changing from Default to Apache Web Server > > Sorry for my ignorance, but am I understanding correctly that yes, CFMX > runs > on OX/X but no, you can't use CFMX on OS/X with Apache? > > If this is the case, That would be a big deterrent from using OS/X to run > CFMX. I'm sure the built-in webserver is nice and all, but most site would > want to run production on something like apache. I currently do not use > os/x > but have thought about switching. > > Sincerely, > > Leon Oosterwijk > ISDN-NET Inc. > (615) 221-4200 > http://www.isdn.net > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jesse Noller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 11:34 AM > > To: CF-Linux > > Subject: RE: Changing from Default to Apache Web Server > > > > > > > Why not? Given the occasional need to customize/recompile > > Apache? Are > > > there > > > any "state secrets" in there? The modules used to come with > > source on > > > Solaris, if I recall correctly. I realize that newer > > version of Apache > > > tend > > > to use dynamically loaded modules, but there are enough > > variations on > > > Apache > > > to warrant the distribution of the module source, I'd think. > > > > > > If this isn't going to happen, what would be the likelihood > > that we could > > > get an "unofficial" module build for Apache on OS X? After > > all, several > > > Macromedians are running CF MX on OS X using the CF MX web > > server, right? > > > Surely they'd like to be able to use a "real" web server? > > > > > > > I tried to push for release of the source code. After review, > > we cannot release the source code to the modules, as there > > are components in there which are "state secrets". > > > > Remember, CF no longer has it's own Apache modules, we use > > JRun's which means is JRun says "No module for you" then we > > get zero module. > > > > As I am one of the people running on OS/X, I would be tempted > > to recompile the module, however, my time available for "Nice > > to do Tasks" is about 0 until sometime in 2005. > > > > Yes. There are enough Apache variations to warrant this. Will > > the source code be released: Not at this time. > > > > -jesse > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-linux%40houseoffusion.com/ To Unsubscribe visit http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_linux or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
