Jesse and folks, we don't experience the same when dealing with ASP/PHP/Perl and even JSP (afaik). Ok, this natural on any programming language such as pure Java, C++ and so on, but I don't agree that such behaviour is natural and expected in server-side scripts/languages such as CF and ASP. Maybe MM could go forward on this and provide something to perform the compilation faster or/and do it on the time we save a cfm template.
I have a friend that says the following about CFMX: it seens that CFMX takes a long turn (gets more time and server resources) to get back to the same place we can start (or just walk a little bit) with JPS. I think this is a crap (CFML is easy, rapid and lovely) but the point is: are the price for the "Java World" too high for merely mortals that just want to do little things with CF (which is the perfect server-side architeture for that)? Abra�os! Alex. -----Original Message----- From: Jesse Noller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26/07/2002 9:44 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: It's official: CFMX is 10% faster than CF5 /takes off tinfoil hat Uh, just to throw this in, compilation of code is something you deal with almost any programming language. C, C++, Java, etc. It's a bit of a movement of a literal line by line read, but overall, it does increase the speed of the end result. Saying "that's Java" is incorrect. "That's Programming" would be more apt. Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED] Macromedia Server Development Unix/Linux "special guy" > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 8:39 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: It's official: CFMX is 10% faster than CF5 > > Yea it is a pain in the ass to have it compile the first time but > thats java for you what do you expect ;) > > See java has its bad points. :P > > Bill Wheatley > Senior Database Developer > Macromedia Certified Advanced Coldfusion Developer > EDIETS.COM > 954.360.9022 X159 > ICQ 417645 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alex Hubner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 4:31 PM > Subject: It's official: CFMX is 10% faster than CF5 > > > > CFMX Performance Brief: CFMX is "only" 10% faster than CF5 under > > Win2k > > boxes: > > http://www.macromedia.com/software/coldfusion/whitepapers/pdf/cfmx_perfo > > rmance_brief.pdf > > > > Well, almost everybody knows it in it's day-by-day tests/usages... > > > > I disagree with the tests. CFMX is not 10% faster than CF5... It > > looks that MM doesn't take in consideration the time (very long, > > specially on templates that calls lots of includes, such as fusebox > > ones), to the just-in-time compiler finish it's job (which takes > > 100% of my CPU)... I've told once and I'm gonna say it again: it's a > > pain in the ass wait CFMX compiles my templates everytime I modify > > it. In a production environment this is acceptable but in a > > development environment is realy bad! It becames painless if you use > > 1Gb processors or faster but... Well, does anybody has the same > > complain? > > > > []'s > > Alex > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
