AFAIK, this path in MX is now relative to the web root directory. Did you try this?
Regards, Marcello Frutig. -- Astrolábio >Has ANYBODY been able to get the site wide error handler templates to work >in CFMX? Everytime I try to add one in the admin it tells me the path is >wrong. I've tried every combination of path variations under the sun. I've >also seen a thread in the mm forums where other people are having the same >problem with no answer yet. > > > >At 11:29 AM 26/07/02 -0300, you wrote: >>Jesse and folks, we don't experience the same when dealing with >>ASP/PHP/Perl and even JSP (afaik). Ok, this natural on any programming >>language such as pure Java, C++ and so on, but I don't agree that such >>behaviour is natural and expected in server-side scripts/languages such >>as CF and ASP. Maybe MM could go forward on this and provide something >>to perform the compilation faster or/and do it on the time we save a >>cfm template. >> >>I have a friend that says the following about CFMX: it seens that CFMX >>takes a long turn (gets more time and server resources) to get back to >>the same place we can start (or just walk a little bit) with JPS. I >>think this is a crap (CFML is easy, rapid and lovely) but the point is: >>are the price for the "Java World" too high for merely mortals that just >>want to do little things with CF (which is the perfect server-side >>architeture for that)? >> >>Abraços! >>Alex. >> >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Jesse Noller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: 26/07/2002 9:44 AM >>To: CF-Talk >>Subject: RE: It's official: CFMX is 10% faster than CF5 >> >> >>/takes off tinfoil hat >> >>Uh, just to throw this in, compilation of code is something you deal >>with almost any programming language. C, C++, Java, etc. It's a bit of a >>movement of a literal line by line read, but overall, it does increase >>the speed of the end result. >> >>Saying "that's Java" is incorrect. "That's Programming" would be more >>apt. >> >>Jesse Noller >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Macromedia Server Development >>Unix/Linux "special guy" >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> > Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 8:39 AM >> > To: CF-Talk >> > Subject: Re: It's official: CFMX is 10% faster than CF5 >> > >> > Yea it is a pain in the ass to have it compile the first time but >> > thats java for you what do you expect ;) >> > >> > See java has its bad points. :P >> > >> > Bill Wheatley >> > Senior Database Developer >> > Macromedia Certified Advanced Coldfusion Developer >> > EDIETS.COM >> > 954.360.9022 X159 >> > ICQ 417645 >> > ----- Original Message ----- >> > From: "Alex Hubner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 4:31 PM >> > Subject: It's official: CFMX is 10% faster than CF5 >> > >> > >> > > CFMX Performance Brief: CFMX is "only" 10% faster than CF5 under >> > > Win2k >> > > boxes: >> > > >>http://www.macromedia.com/software/coldfusion/whitepapers/pdf/cfmx_perfo >> > > rmance_brief.pdf >> > > >> > > Well, almost everybody knows it in it's day-by-day tests/usages... >> > > >> > > I disagree with the tests. CFMX is not 10% faster than CF5... It >> > > looks that MM doesn't take in consideration the time (very long, >> > > specially on templates that calls lots of includes, such as fusebox >> > > ones), to the just-in-time compiler finish it's job (which takes >> > > 100% of my CPU)... I've told once and I'm gonna say it again: it's a >> >> > > pain in the ass wait CFMX compiles my templates everytime I modify >> > > it. In a production environment this is acceptable but in a >> > > development environment is realy bad! It becames painless if you use >> >> > > 1Gb processors or faster but... Well, does anybody has the same >> > > complain? >> > > >> > > []'s >> > > Alex >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > ______________________________________________________________________ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
