Yeah, I tried that. Has anyone got this working? Can someone running CFMX confirm that this is a bug please? Or just me..
At 02:44 PM 26/07/02 -0300, you wrote: >AFAIK, this path in MX is now relative to the web root directory. Did you >try this? > >Regards, >Marcello Frutig. >-- Astrol�bio > > >Has ANYBODY been able to get the site wide error handler templates to work > >in CFMX? Everytime I try to add one in the admin it tells me the path is > >wrong. I've tried every combination of path variations under the sun. I've > >also seen a thread in the mm forums where other people are having the same > >problem with no answer yet. > > > > > > > >At 11:29 AM 26/07/02 -0300, you wrote: > >>Jesse and folks, we don't experience the same when dealing with > >>ASP/PHP/Perl and even JSP (afaik). Ok, this natural on any programming > >>language such as pure Java, C++ and so on, but I don't agree that such > >>behaviour is natural and expected in server-side scripts/languages such > >>as CF and ASP. Maybe MM could go forward on this and provide something > >>to perform the compilation faster or/and do it on the time we save a > >>cfm template. > >> > >>I have a friend that says the following about CFMX: it seens that CFMX > >>takes a long turn (gets more time and server resources) to get back to > >>the same place we can start (or just walk a little bit) with JPS. I > >>think this is a crap (CFML is easy, rapid and lovely) but the point is: > >>are the price for the "Java World" too high for merely mortals that just > >>want to do little things with CF (which is the perfect server-side > >>architeture for that)? > >> > >>Abra�os! > >>Alex. > >> > >> > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Jesse Noller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >>Sent: 26/07/2002 9:44 AM > >>To: CF-Talk > >>Subject: RE: It's official: CFMX is 10% faster than CF5 > >> > >> > >>/takes off tinfoil hat > >> > >>Uh, just to throw this in, compilation of code is something you deal > >>with almost any programming language. C, C++, Java, etc. It's a bit of a > >>movement of a literal line by line read, but overall, it does increase > >>the speed of the end result. > >> > >>Saying "that's Java" is incorrect. "That's Programming" would be more > >>apt. > >> > >>Jesse Noller > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Macromedia Server Development > >>Unix/Linux "special guy" > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- > >> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >> > Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 8:39 AM > >> > To: CF-Talk > >> > Subject: Re: It's official: CFMX is 10% faster than CF5 > >> > > >> > Yea it is a pain in the ass to have it compile the first time but > >> > thats java for you what do you expect ;) > >> > > >> > See java has its bad points. :P > >> > > >> > Bill Wheatley > >> > Senior Database Developer > >> > Macromedia Certified Advanced Coldfusion Developer > >> > EDIETS.COM > >> > 954.360.9022 X159 > >> > ICQ 417645 > >> > ----- Original Message ----- > >> > From: "Alex Hubner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 4:31 PM > >> > Subject: It's official: CFMX is 10% faster than CF5 > >> > > >> > > >> > > CFMX Performance Brief: CFMX is "only" 10% faster than CF5 under > >> > > Win2k > >> > > boxes: > >> > > > >>http://www.macromedia.com/software/coldfusion/whitepapers/pdf/cfmx_perfo > >> > > rmance_brief.pdf > >> > > > >> > > Well, almost everybody knows it in it's day-by-day tests/usages... > >> > > > >> > > I disagree with the tests. CFMX is not 10% faster than CF5... It > >> > > looks that MM doesn't take in consideration the time (very long, > >> > > specially on templates that calls lots of includes, such as fusebox > >> > > ones), to the just-in-time compiler finish it's job (which takes > >> > > 100% of my CPU)... I've told once and I'm gonna say it again: it's a > >> > >> > > pain in the ass wait CFMX compiles my templates everytime I modify > >> > > it. In a production environment this is acceptable but in a > >> > > development environment is realy bad! It becames painless if you use > >> > >> > > 1Gb processors or faster but... Well, does anybody has the same > >> > > complain? > >> > > > >> > > []'s > >> > > Alex > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
