I see this as an opportunity to reinforce the need for better application architecture and code planning, reducing what we call here, in Portuguese, "programa��o por atrito" (friction programming??).
Marcello Frutig. -- Astrolabio >/takes off tinfoil hat > >Uh, just to throw this in, compilation of code is something you deal with almost any >programming language. C, C++, Java, etc. It's a bit of a movement of a literal line >by line read, but overall, it does increase the speed of the end result. > >Saying "that's Java" is incorrect. "That's Programming" would be more apt. > >Jesse Noller >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Macromedia Server Development >Unix/Linux "special guy" > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 8:39 AM >> To: CF-Talk >> Subject: Re: It's official: CFMX is 10% faster than CF5 >> >> Yea it is a pain in the ass to have it compile the first time but thats >> java >> for you what do you expect ;) >> >> See java has its bad points. :P >> >> Bill Wheatley >> Senior Database Developer >> Macromedia Certified Advanced Coldfusion Developer >> EDIETS.COM >> 954.360.9022 X159 >> ICQ 417645 >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Alex Hubner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 4:31 PM >> Subject: It's official: CFMX is 10% faster than CF5 >> >> >> > CFMX Performance Brief: CFMX is "only" 10% faster than CF5 under Win2k >> > boxes: >> > http://www.macromedia.com/software/coldfusion/whitepapers/pdf/cfmx_perfo >> > rmance_brief.pdf >> > >> > Well, almost everybody knows it in it's day-by-day tests/usages... >> > >> > I disagree with the tests. CFMX is not 10% faster than CF5... It looks >> > that MM doesn't take in consideration the time (very long, specially on >> > templates that calls lots of includes, such as fusebox ones), to the >> > just-in-time compiler finish it's job (which takes 100% of my CPU)... >> > I've told once and I'm gonna say it again: it's a pain in the ass wait >> > CFMX compiles my templates everytime I modify it. In a production >> > environment this is acceptable but in a development environment is realy >> > bad! It becames painless if you use 1Gb processors or faster but... >> > Well, does anybody has the same complain? >> > >> > []'s >> > Alex >> > >> > >> > ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
