I love it - and that has to be on an intro with a spinning preload 
graphic right?

Chad Gray wrote:

>You forgot.. Your client wants that dancing monkey to crawl across the
>screen, pick up the bannanna, and eat it.
>
>Code that in loops.  :-)
>
>Oh.. And next month the dancing monkey has to be a fish that eats a
>worm.
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Stacy Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
>Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 7:00 PM
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: RE: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?
>
>
>I've been wondering lately about the cost of development for
>Flash...what if there was an alternate way to develop the flash
>interface using pre-made components? (above and beyond what exists
>today)
>
>Would it be crazy to image writing a web page in a markup language which
>produced flash? I've always thought the development environment was the
>biggest hurdle but that could very well be because I'm coming from a
>programming background and not a designer's...
>
><select>
>   <cfloop query="cities">
>   <option>#city#
>   </cfloop>
></select>
>
>In Flash:
>
><flash:select id="cityselect">
>   <cfloop query="cities">
>   <flash:option>#city#
>   </cfloop>
></ flash:select>
>
>It's getting late, I'm talking crazy...
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Paris Lundis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
>Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 9:43 PM
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: RE: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?
>
>cost of development alone may be the biggest deterrent...
>
>in our world its:
>
>interface (graphic)
>content (text)
>html
>applications (cf)
>
>clients want to pay only for the HTML :) the apps have to be done
>cheaply, and quickly... thus CF... Interface is always an issue...
>modifying Photoshop designs to cross browser implemented HTML is a pain
>in the arse as it is...
>
>Can only wonder how expensive Flash would get... because now you add a
>new layer of behaviors, many multiples of design and round trip
>interaction and tracking... lots of stuff...
>
>Flash should be proximate to CD Rom development... The average CD Rom
>development costs what these days?
>
>-paris
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Chad Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 12:30 AM
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: RE: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?
>
>
>Try to sell the clients on the costs of developing the flash.
>
>If you count up the hours.  Flash is NOT cheap.
>
>If you count up the hours maintaining flash... It is REALLY not cheap.
>
>My .02 from experience.
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Bonnie E. Betts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 7:16 PM
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda?
>
>
>Is it me, or has anyone else noticed there's a REALLY strong push for =
>Flash lately at all the CFUGs and conferences??  Is there any particular
>= reason for this?
>
>I like Flash - don't get me wrong.  But I view it as a GUI frill that I
>= doubt I can sell to my clients who want a functional business =
>application.  Anyone here can tell me why/how I could sell them Flash =
>which would be over and above CF development?
>
>Bonnie E. Betts
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>www.bettsIT.com
>703.508.9766
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
______________________________________________________________________
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to