Oh no... The monkey IS the navigation system. If you point the monkey to the product they have to add it to the basket.
Of course next month the fish has to do that task. -----Original Message----- From: Jason Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 11:20 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda? I love it - and that has to be on an intro with a spinning preload graphic right? Chad Gray wrote: >You forgot.. Your client wants that dancing monkey to crawl across the >screen, pick up the bannanna, and eat it. > >Code that in loops. :-) > >Oh.. And next month the dancing monkey has to be a fish that eats a >worm. > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Stacy Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 7:00 PM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: RE: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda? > > >I've been wondering lately about the cost of development for >Flash...what if there was an alternate way to develop the flash >interface using pre-made components? (above and beyond what exists >today) > >Would it be crazy to image writing a web page in a markup language >which produced flash? I've always thought the development environment >was the biggest hurdle but that could very well be because I'm coming >from a programming background and not a designer's... > ><select> > <cfloop query="cities"> > <option>#city# > </cfloop> ></select> > >In Flash: > ><flash:select id="cityselect"> > <cfloop query="cities"> > <flash:option>#city# > </cfloop> ></ flash:select> > >It's getting late, I'm talking crazy... > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Paris Lundis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 9:43 PM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: RE: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda? > >cost of development alone may be the biggest deterrent... > >in our world its: > >interface (graphic) >content (text) >html >applications (cf) > >clients want to pay only for the HTML :) the apps have to be done >cheaply, and quickly... thus CF... Interface is always an issue... >modifying Photoshop designs to cross browser implemented HTML is a pain >in the arse as it is... > >Can only wonder how expensive Flash would get... because now you add a >new layer of behaviors, many multiples of design and round trip >interaction and tracking... lots of stuff... > >Flash should be proximate to CD Rom development... The average CD Rom >development costs what these days? > >-paris > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Chad Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 12:30 AM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: RE: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda? > > >Try to sell the clients on the costs of developing the flash. > >If you count up the hours. Flash is NOT cheap. > >If you count up the hours maintaining flash... It is REALLY not cheap. > >My .02 from experience. > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Bonnie E. Betts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 7:16 PM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: Does Macromedia have some current strong Flash agenda? > > >Is it me, or has anyone else noticed there's a REALLY strong push for = >Flash lately at all the CFUGs and conferences?? Is there any >particular = reason for this? > >I like Flash - don't get me wrong. But I view it as a GUI frill that I >= doubt I can sell to my clients who want a functional business = >application. Anyone here can tell me why/how I could sell them Flash = >which would be over and above CF development? > >Bonnie E. Betts >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >www.bettsIT.com >703.508.9766 > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
