Erm what were you expecting ? It's a Microsoft Article promoting a Microsoft product of course its going to bias towards its own product... Otherwise it's a bit like BlueDragon saying "yea we got a cool product, but your better off with Macromedias CF" ?
Mikey -----Original Message----- From: Jesse Houwing [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 16:44 To: CF-Talk Subject: MSDN on CF -> ASP.net First it explains what both ASP.net and Coldfusion are and that they share a similar background. A simpel feature comparison is used to show how one can convert a Coldfusion Application to ASP.net. It contains a few errors, especially 'forgetting' to mention that a lot of functionality is available in the standard JAVA API's which van be directly accessed from coldfusion (Image support in ASP.net is also only available through teh .Net framework, the same applies to SAX XML support and Threading). They conclude that ASP.net is more reliable, faster scaling better etc. etc. without showing any figures ro numbers. Read it for yourself: http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnaspp/html /coldfusiontoaspnet.asp Jesse ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
