<cfimport taglib="..\extensions\customtags\ui" prefix="asp">
<asp:input type="text" ... /> See where I'm going with this? Tell me where the app logic is required... -- jon mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thursday, July 17, 2003, 12:20:37 PM, you wrote: ksc> The paragraph is correct. ksc> You can write a presentation layer in ASP.NET with absolutely zero application logic. All the time. With no exceptions. ksc> This still isn't possible in CF, or JSP, or ASP, or PHP, etc... ksc> ----- Original Message ----- ksc> From: Mike Brunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ksc> Date: Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:07 am ksc> Subject: RE: MSDN on CF -> ASP.net >> I'm on my way out so can't read all, but paragraph 3 deserves some >> kind of >> response: - >> >> "ColdFusion follows the same development and page execution model >> as that of >> classic ASP, PHP, JSP, and other similar Web-scripting languages. >> Specifically, code is embedded in HTML markup, and as a given page >> executesfrom top to bottom, the output of the code's execution >> takes the place of >> the embedded code in the resulting HTML document. This development >> model is >> easy to grasp, but it does have a number of drawbacks. Chief among >> these is >> the lack of separation between application logic and presentation >> markup.Mixing code and presentation makes the code harder to read, >> which increases >> the time and effort involved in maintenance, and creates significant >> challenges for non-programming graphic designers who need to >> modify a page. >> Over the years, ColdFusion has introduced several ways to mitigate >> this lack >> of separation, including custom tags, and others-but the >> fundamental model >> remains." >> >> What about cfc's and for those who really want to move more OO >> concepts CF >> and Mach II. This is typical MS BS and deserves a response from >> MM in my >> opinion. (A lot of bloody abbreviations there!). >> >> Kind Regards - Mike Brunt >> Webapper Services LLC >> Web Site http://www.webapper.com >> Blog http://www.webapper.net >> >> Webapper <Web Application Specialists> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jesse Houwing [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 8:44 AM >> To: CF-Talk >> Subject: MSDN on CF -> ASP.net >> >> First it explains what both ASP.net and Coldfusion are and that >> they share a >> similar background. A simpel feature comparison is used to show >> how one can >> convert a Coldfusion Application to ASP.net. >> >> It contains a few errors, especially 'forgetting' to mention that >> a lot of >> functionality is available in the standard JAVA API's which van be >> directlyaccessed from coldfusion (Image support in ASP.net is also >> only available >> through teh .Net framework, the same applies to SAX XML support and >> Threading). >> >> They conclude that ASP.net is more reliable, faster scaling better >> etc. etc. >> without showing any figures ro numbers. >> >> Read it for yourself: >> >> http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en- >> us/dnaspp/html/coldfusiontoaspnet.asp >> >> Jesse >> >> ksc> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
