Can you give a very small example of this, i.e. real code? ======================================================================== === Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master for Mindseye, Inc (www.mindseye.com) Member of Team Macromedia (http://www.macromedia.com/go/teammacromedia)
Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blog : www.camdenfamily.com/morpheus/blog Yahoo IM : morpheus "My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:21 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: RE: MSDN on CF -> ASP.net > > > The paragraph is correct. > > You can write a presentation layer in ASP.NET with absolutely > zero application logic. All the time. With no exceptions. > > This still isn't possible in CF, or JSP, or ASP, or PHP, etc... > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Mike Brunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:07 am > Subject: RE: MSDN on CF -> ASP.net > > > I'm on my way out so can't read all, but paragraph 3 deserves some > > kind of > > response: - > > > > "ColdFusion follows the same development and page execution model > > as that of > > classic ASP, PHP, JSP, and other similar Web-scripting languages. > > Specifically, code is embedded in HTML markup, and as a given page > > executesfrom top to bottom, the output of the code's execution > > takes the place of > > the embedded code in the resulting HTML document. This development > > model is > > easy to grasp, but it does have a number of drawbacks. Chief among > > these is > > the lack of separation between application logic and presentation > > markup.Mixing code and presentation makes the code harder to read, > > which increases > > the time and effort involved in maintenance, and creates significant > > challenges for non-programming graphic designers who need to > > modify a page. > > Over the years, ColdFusion has introduced several ways to mitigate > > this lack > > of separation, including custom tags, and others-but the > > fundamental model > > remains." > > > > What about cfc's and for those who really want to move more OO > > concepts CF > > and Mach II. This is typical MS BS and deserves a response from > > MM in my > > opinion. (A lot of bloody abbreviations there!). > > > > Kind Regards - Mike Brunt > > Webapper Services LLC > > Web Site http://www.webapper.com > > Blog http://www.webapper.net > > > > Webapper <Web Application Specialists> > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jesse Houwing [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 8:44 AM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: MSDN on CF -> ASP.net > > > > First it explains what both ASP.net and Coldfusion are and that > > they share a > > similar background. A simpel feature comparison is used to show > > how one can > > convert a Coldfusion Application to ASP.net. > > > > It contains a few errors, especially 'forgetting' to mention that > > a lot of > > functionality is available in the standard JAVA API's which van be > > directlyaccessed from coldfusion (Image support in ASP.net is also > > only available > > through teh .Net framework, the same applies to SAX XML support and > > Threading). > > > > They conclude that ASP.net is more reliable, faster scaling better > > etc. etc. > > without showing any figures ro numbers. > > > > Read it for yourself: > > > > http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en- > > us/dnaspp/html/coldfusiontoaspnet.asp > > > > Jesse > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
