And then... <asp:input type="text" value="#someValue#"/>
There's your app logic right there... ----- Original Message ----- From: jon hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:38 am Subject: Re: MSDN on CF -> ASP.net > <cfimport taglib="..\extensions\customtags\ui" prefix="asp"> > > <asp:input type="text" ... /> > > See where I'm going with this? Tell me where the app logic is > required... > -- > jon > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Thursday, July 17, 2003, 12:20:37 PM, you wrote: > ksc> The paragraph is correct. > > ksc> You can write a presentation layer in ASP.NET with absolutely > zero application logic. All the time. With no exceptions. > > ksc> This still isn't possible in CF, or JSP, or ASP, or PHP, etc... > > ksc> ----- Original Message ----- > ksc> From: Mike Brunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ksc> Date: Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:07 am > ksc> Subject: RE: MSDN on CF -> ASP.net > > >> I'm on my way out so can't read all, but paragraph 3 deserves > some > >> kind of > >> response: - > >> > >> "ColdFusion follows the same development and page execution > model > >> as that of > >> classic ASP, PHP, JSP, and other similar Web-scripting languages. > >> Specifically, code is embedded in HTML markup, and as a given > page > >> executesfrom top to bottom, the output of the code's execution > >> takes the place of > >> the embedded code in the resulting HTML document. This > development > >> model is > >> easy to grasp, but it does have a number of drawbacks. Chief > among > >> these is > >> the lack of separation between application logic and > presentation > >> markup.Mixing code and presentation makes the code harder to > read, > >> which increases > >> the time and effort involved in maintenance, and creates > significant>> challenges for non-programming graphic designers who > need to > >> modify a page. > >> Over the years, ColdFusion has introduced several ways to > mitigate > >> this lack > >> of separation, including custom tags, and others-but the > >> fundamental model > >> remains." > >> > >> What about cfc's and for those who really want to move more OO > >> concepts CF > >> and Mach II. This is typical MS BS and deserves a response > from > >> MM in my > >> opinion. (A lot of bloody abbreviations there!). > >> > >> Kind Regards - Mike Brunt > >> Webapper Services LLC > >> Web Site http://www.webapper.com > >> Blog http://www.webapper.net > >> > >> Webapper <Web Application Specialists> > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Jesse Houwing [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 8:44 AM > >> To: CF-Talk > >> Subject: MSDN on CF -> ASP.net > >> > >> First it explains what both ASP.net and Coldfusion are and that > >> they share a > >> similar background. A simpel feature comparison is used to show > >> how one can > >> convert a Coldfusion Application to ASP.net. > >> > >> It contains a few errors, especially 'forgetting' to mention > that > >> a lot of > >> functionality is available in the standard JAVA API's which van > be > >> directlyaccessed from coldfusion (Image support in ASP.net is > also > >> only available > >> through teh .Net framework, the same applies to SAX XML support and > >> Threading). > >> > >> They conclude that ASP.net is more reliable, faster scaling > better > >> etc. etc. > >> without showing any figures ro numbers. > >> > >> Read it for yourself: > >> > >> http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en- > >> us/dnaspp/html/coldfusiontoaspnet.asp > >> > >> Jesse > >> > >> > ksc> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
