Hi, >> The phrase "use what works for you" comes to mind.
I could not agree with you more. I would not expect anyone to do otherwise; unless I am paying them to do so. >> I don't think a lot of people that >> DON'T use Fusebox are "opponents" I don't either and was not attempting to lump non-Fuseboxers into my case for secret sauces. My intent was to show that many people simply can't let the fact that others do use Fusebox sit without commenting how their framework or methodology is superior. I am not saying a superior framework does not exist; there just isn't one publicly available that is known to be superior. If there was I would likely be using it. >> many have credible reasons why >> they don't use it Many of the very credible reason have also been solved, yet continue to be stated as issues. There also seems to be may people who speak out with little in-depth knowledge of the subject and the resent being told they are incorrect about an assertion. Of course there are may aspects that are just personal likes and dislikes and while one may see the issue as valid, others may see it as trivial. Once again the use what works for you rule is king. :) >> people just can't accept that what >> THEY think isn't what everyone else thinks. Agreed; however, I am not among them. As I stated before I would gladly see the light if someone would show it to me. >> I could care less if anyone thinks it's because >> I am "keeping" it from them because I think it's >> "better" than their precious Fusebox It is not a matter of an individual keeping it a secret. The jest lies in the notion that anyone with breath can "say" they know something to be true, but very few have proven it. >> is this one of those times when something >> is so glorious it should just be accepted >> without any scrutiny? Absolutely not! The reverse also holds true; don't knock it if you haven't tried it. And by trying it I don't mean downloading it and looking it over. I mean actually putting it through the paces and giving yourself ample time to become proficient with it. If you still think it sucks, by all means don't use it. >> just another sad attempt to discredit >> someone or some company that doesn't >> use it by stooping to levels unbecoming >> of a professional. I have not seen this in this particular thread, but the case can obviously be made for both sides of the issue and has more to do with personal shortcoming rather than framework shortcomings. I hope I haven't offended you in any way and if I have I apologize. Best regards, Michael Wilson ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
