I'm right with you Michael. I've heard from plenty of folks just itching for a chance to rip on Fusebox (or any topic at all, actually). But when it comes to actually delivering a superior solution, folks tend to fall suspiciously silent...
I would switch from Fusebox to something else in 5 seconds if someone could present a truly superior alternative. Thus far (and I've been looking for years), no one's actually delivered. >Hi, > >You probably hear this allot because "opponents" (why these exist I do not >know) of Fusebox generally tout better ways of achieving the same goal. This >better way is usually labeled "my own methodology" or "the framework I've >developed". Fusebox is open source and available to anyone with a desire to >download it; therefore, it is open to examination and opinion. The internals >of "my own framework" is rarely seen by the masses and such is termed >"secret" by those defending the merits of Fusebox. My opinion on this matter >is; if you have a framework you think out performs Fusebox, put it on the >table and see how it holds up. I would be happy to use anything that is >free, community driven, and makes my development process easier or more >organized. > >Best regards, >Michael Wilson > >-----Original Message----- >From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 5:18 PM >To: CF-Talk > >As a CF developer, I've yet to see a "secret" methodology, but I hear this a >lot from Fusebox advocates. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
