Got it, thanks. This could work if the arrows/lines were not included in the animation. The correspondence of points to numbers is not as apparent when there is an arrow extending from the origin to the point, creating an 'overlap' of colours. The challenge that remains is balance the spacial requirements of the bottom 'blackboard' graph with the space needed to accommodate the vectors. I think you mentioned in a previous post that the vectors and matrices are unnecessary in the animation as they have more to do with rank. I believe they are still important, especially to newcomers who may not be used to thinking of operations that work on an entire matrix. Anyway, the available space/resolution becomes a challenge. I'll see if I can at least retain the 'blackboard' graph for vectors with regard to rank 0 operators.
Cheers, bob On -Mar28-2010, at -Mar28-20106:39 PM, Raul Miller wrote: > On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 7:55 PM, bob therriault <[email protected]> wrote: >> So I take it that you are suggesting a correspondence between the >> colour of the numbers in the vector and the lines drawn on the graph, >> but I think I am missing something about the significance of how the >> numbers are organized to match the graph. Aside from the fact that >> the imaginary and real absolute magnitudes are equal, I don't see how >> the second example differs from the first in how it is organized to >> match the graph. I'm intrigued. Illuminate me. > > In the first example, the numbers left to right position will > match the position of their colored arrows on graph. This is > a "coincidental" arrangement but suggests the real correspondence. > > In the second example, they do not. > > -- > Raul > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
