On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 2:21 PM, ray horn <[email protected]> wrote: > > WARNING: You might want to block my email address from posting to this list > - I have run into an issue you cannot resolve and therefore you should block > my ability to speak about it lest others also realize Cherokee is not a > serious effort.
If you were on one of the irc channels or forums I moderate, you would have been tempbanned, but for being an ass to the developers and the people trying to help you, rather than your ability to find bugs; it's not so much the fact that you brought up an issue (which most of us *agree* is an issue), but rather your demanding "fix this now, bitch" attitude that seems to have angered the locals. It seems Alvaro is a bit nicer than me, though. > What do you mean, "update from unstable" ? > Do you people deploy your code to an unstable update system and then wait for > unsuspecting people to use that code rather than the stable stuff ? > I used the following commands: > "apt-get update" > "apt-get upgrade -V" > Which command requires the option to upgrade from known good and stable ? You're using the *unstable* repositories. It is not a difference in commands, but rather in which repositories you have selected. > You cannot get me to say I use Cherokee unless it works. > You cannot get me to write about the joy of using Cherokee unless it works. Alright? > Perhaps I should be telling people to use Apache when I have been telling > people to use Cherokee. I'm not sure if I'd accept sysadmin advice from someone who uses [unstable] repositories on a production server while expecting them to act like [stable]. > "Cherokee is an interesting toy and an interesting experiment but DO NOT use > it for Production servers." <-- Is this what you want me to tell people ?!? > If so, consider it done... How 'bout "Cherokee is an interesting toy and an interesting experiment but DO NOT use it for Production servers, unless you're willing to spend time and effort to debug issues and/or pay for support."? Performance comes at a price, in a similar manner as the common saying "OSS is only free if your time doesn't cost anything". If you wanted an SUV, you shouldn't have bought a Porsche. As a side note, whatever you're using to send messages is adding large amounts of bloat to your messages. Confidentiality notices are rather silly for messages posted to a public mailing list, and I daresay most of us don't care a whit about your LinkedIn or Twitter accounts, and it makes trimming messages a bit more work than it would be otherwise. -- James Pearson -- The best way to predict the future is to invent it. - Alan Kay _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
