Guys, did you google for "ray c horn"? I got this as the first result: http://rayhornsucks.onesite.com/ If this is about "our Ray", now I understand a bit more clear... =P
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 7:44 PM, James Pearson <[email protected]>wrote: > On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 2:21 PM, ray horn <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > WARNING: You might want to block my email address from posting to this > list - I have run into an issue you cannot resolve and therefore you should > block my ability to speak about it lest others also realize Cherokee is not > a serious effort. > > If you were on one of the irc channels or forums I moderate, you would > have been tempbanned, but for being an ass to the developers and the > people trying to help you, rather than your ability to find bugs; it's > not so much the fact that you brought up an issue (which most of us > *agree* is an issue), but rather your demanding "fix this now, bitch" > attitude that seems to have angered the locals. It seems Alvaro is a > bit nicer than me, though. > > > What do you mean, "update from unstable" ? > > Do you people deploy your code to an unstable update system and then wait > for unsuspecting people to use that code rather than the stable stuff ? > > I used the following commands: > > "apt-get update" > > "apt-get upgrade -V" > > Which command requires the option to upgrade from known good and stable ? > > You're using the *unstable* repositories. It is not a difference in > commands, but rather in which repositories you have selected. > > > You cannot get me to say I use Cherokee unless it works. > > You cannot get me to write about the joy of using Cherokee unless it > works. > > Alright? > > > Perhaps I should be telling people to use Apache when I have been telling > people to use Cherokee. > > I'm not sure if I'd accept sysadmin advice from someone who uses > [unstable] repositories on a production server while expecting them to > act like [stable]. > > > "Cherokee is an interesting toy and an interesting experiment but DO NOT > use it for Production servers." <-- Is this what you want me to tell people > ?!? If so, consider it done... > > How 'bout "Cherokee is an interesting toy and an interesting > experiment but DO NOT use it for Production servers, unless you're > willing to spend time and effort to debug issues and/or pay for > support."? Performance comes at a price, in a similar manner as the > common saying "OSS is only free if your time doesn't cost anything". > If you wanted an SUV, you shouldn't have bought a Porsche. > > As a side note, whatever you're using to send messages is adding large > amounts of bloat to your messages. Confidentiality notices are rather > silly for messages posted to a public mailing list, and I daresay most > of us don't care a whit about your LinkedIn or Twitter accounts, and > it makes trimming messages a bit more work than it would be otherwise. > > -- > James Pearson > -- > The best way to predict the future is to invent it. > - Alan Kay > _______________________________________________ > Cherokee mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee >
_______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
