Of course why not.. end of discussion .... Or maybe not, ........
Stalin and Churchill had a lot of interaction, whereas Churchill and Hitler none face to face, I wonder if WSC and Herr Wolf were both equally as wary of Stalin. Out of the three of them Hitler had the duller life. WSC and Stalin had journalism in common, with Stalin editing Pravda and WSC writing for many, both escaped from imprisonment etc etc Yet with all the great things that WSC did, said and helped restore and maintain, there are today more supporters in today's youth of Herr Wolf than of WSC. That is not only sad it is scary, however in Europe the Nazi's are perceived by many to be the only ones fighting against the invasion of the EU by another terror group, this time the "enemy" is using stealth and numbers and political correctness rather than guns and bombs (although the occasional reminder to EU politicians via a bus, train or underground bomb is always a help to keep them kowtowed) I have been told that Enoch P was a man before his time ........... It is a pity there are no Churchill's today, because there ARE PLENTY STALINS AND HITLERS!!! David -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Renee Ingeberg Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 12:11 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [ChurchillChat] Re: Francis Neilson's The Tragedy of Europe I think that the discussion about which person was worse is totally meaningless. They were both horrendous....what more is there to discuss about that particular subject? Renee Ingeberg On Feb 28, 2009, at 6:00 PM, Johan Arve wrote: > > My remarks were not aimed at you, but Neilson. > > As for the comparison with Stalin, I'd argue that as late as 1939 the > latter was actually worse, even if Hitler did a remarkable effort to > catch up in the years that followed. However, the statement I > commented compared Hitler to "any other" (IIRC) which would, as I > understand a language that is not my native one, include all other > leading European politicians, which would be patently untrue. > > On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 7:08 AM, Scott Manning <[email protected] > > wrote: >> Please understand that I'm not supporting or defending Neilson; I'm >> simply >> trying to understand his position. He doesn't say that Hitler was not >> tyrannical before 1939, but does say that Hitler was no more >> tyrannical than >> others (e.g. Stalin). >> >> Scott Manning >> Philadelphia, PA >> http://www.digitalsurvivors.com/ >> >>> >> > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ChurchillChat" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ChurchillChat?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
