I think that the discussion about which person was worse is totally meaningless. They were both horrendous....what more is there to discuss about that particular subject?
Renee Ingeberg On Feb 28, 2009, at 6:00 PM, Johan Arve wrote: > > My remarks were not aimed at you, but Neilson. > > As for the comparison with Stalin, I'd argue that as late as 1939 the > latter was actually worse, even if Hitler did a remarkable effort to > catch up in the years that followed. However, the statement I > commented compared Hitler to "any other" (IIRC) which would, as I > understand a language that is not my native one, include all other > leading European politicians, which would be patently untrue. > > On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 7:08 AM, Scott Manning <[email protected] > > wrote: >> Please understand that I'm not supporting or defending Neilson; I'm >> simply >> trying to understand his position. He doesn't say that Hitler was not >> tyrannical before 1939, but does say that Hitler was no more >> tyrannical than >> others (e.g. Stalin). >> >> Scott Manning >> Philadelphia, PA >> http://www.digitalsurvivors.com/ >> >>> >> > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ChurchillChat" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ChurchillChat?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
